· Private foundation
Booz Allen Foundation
EMPOWER PEOPLE TO USE TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION TO BREAK CYCLES OF STRUCTURAL INEQUITY AND BUILD GENERATIONAL RESILIENCE.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $575k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YEAR UP | $100,000 |
| SLIDING DOORS STEM & DYSLEXIA LEARNING CENTER | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $75,000 |
| ELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE | $75,000 |
| MANA DE SAN DIEGO | $50,000 |
| ANACOSTIA ON-RAMPS TO CAREERS | $50,000 |
| GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL | $50,000 |
| THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTON | $50,000 |
| ANACOSTIA COLLEGE TRACK | $50,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE | $35,000 |
| STEM FOR HER FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| B-360 BALTIMORE INC | $20,000 |
| EAST LAKE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| SOUL PROGRAM | $20,000 |
| ENVISION EXCELLENCE IN STEM EDUCATION | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $290k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Feeding America2× · 2020–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +40%- MDMANA DE SAN DIEGO2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +151%
- SPSAFE PASSAGES2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +309%
Funded once
- MOMASKS ON CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $100k
- BLBECKY LEE WOMENS SUPPORT FUNDone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -14% · 53% of their budget
University of Chicagograduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…
To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
Digital Girl, Inc. (DGI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of New York City, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM ( Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) disciplines.
To deliver innovative leadership development programs and creative solutions that identify, accelerate, and elevate underrepresented talent throughout their careers.
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
The organization's mission is to bring academic, work, life and economic opportunities to students whose potential to contribute to a robust florida is largely untapped.
Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…
Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…
Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Year Up Inc and the most unlike its peers is Women in Cyber Security. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds THE MINORITY PSYCHOLOGY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ELEMENTARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MANA DE SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds BECKY LEE WOMENS SUPPORT FUND ↗
- Who funds SAFE PASSAGES ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
- Who funds SLIDING DOORS STEM & DYSLEXIA LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds COLEMAN A YOUNG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEM for Her Foundation ↗
- Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MET CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Girl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds FULL STEAM FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds EASTLAKE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SAN DIEGO-IMPERIAL COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FILIPINO YOUTH LEADERSHIP PROGRAM ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Women In Cyber Security ↗
- Who funds MYSECUREKID INC ↗
- Who funds Out in Science Technology Engineering & Mathematics Inc oSTEM ↗
- Who funds Student-Athletes Organized to Under ↗
- Who funds B-360 Baltimore Inc ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The California Wellness Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Booz Allen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.