· Private foundation
Bluescope Foundation North America
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k190 grants · $605k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $197k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $231k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOROTHY DAY HOUSE | $75,000 |
| FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT INC | $56,000 |
| MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ROCK COUNTY | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $22,367 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MEMPHIS INC | $15,000 |
| MEDICAL LAKE FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| REGIONAL INTER-FAITH ASSOCIATION | $12,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS OF TENNESSEE | $12,500 |
| NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM | $10,000 |
| OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH | $10,000 |
| RESTART INC | $10,000 |
| CORNERSTONES OF CARE | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MEMPHIS | $10,000 |
| COWLITZ COUNTY CHILD ADVOCATES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $634k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
243 repeat relationships — 152 still active in FY2025, 91 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHALO FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +8%
- AFANNVILLE FREE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION2× · 2022–2025 · $103k · revenue +23%
- FCFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC5× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +153%
Funded once
THE HUTTON SETTLEMENTgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $45k · revenue +33%- ARAMERICAN RED CROSSone grant, 2020 · $8k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Northeast Kansas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jensen Memorial Youth Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
231 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 231 of the 399 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HALO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds ANNVILLE FREE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DOROTHY DAY HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY ↗
- Who funds FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CARPENTER ART GARDEN ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONES OF CARE ↗
- Who funds ABILITY KC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis Inc ↗
- Who funds MID-SOUTH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUTTON SETTLEMENT ↗
- Who funds SUNFLOWER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LEBANON VALLEY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS ↗
- Who funds COWLITZ COUNTY CHILD ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHAPOINTE ↗
- Who funds NEW DAY CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Robidoux Resident Theatre ↗
- Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds RESTART INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds ARTSTECH ↗
- Who funds WEAVE INC ↗
- Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE YMCA OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Kansas City · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation · Henry E Wurst Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bluescope Foundation North America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
- Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
- Marion-Polk Food Share Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bluescope Foundation North America?
Find your warmest path to Bluescope Foundation North America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.