Washington · Nonprofit
CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER
CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,456,903 to it, the largest being WINDERMERE FOUNDATION ($1,178,750). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,392 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centersshared fundersportfolio match
- Evans-Kelly Family Foundationlocal
- Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacyportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2018 41% · 2019 63% · 2020 64% · 2021 46% · 2022 66% · 2023 60% · 2024 57% · 2025 52%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
74% of CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $163k → $160k.
From the IRS filings of CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 81% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 81% · 2018 71% · 2019 91% · 2020 80% · 2021 76% · 2022 84% · 2023 88% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
57% of CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
97% of CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER's grant income comes from Washington funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Ohio Network of Children's Advocacy Centersshared fundersportfolio matchOH · backs 13 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Evans-Kelly Family FoundationlocalOR · funds 14 organizations near you
- Tennessee Chapter of Children's Advocacyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alabama Network of Children's Advocacy Centers Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Arkansasportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Texas Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Sexually Abused Children's Relief Endeavor (Sacred)portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Children's Advocacy Centers of Georgia Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Colorado Child Advocacy Allianceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Louisiana Alliance of Childrens Advocacy Centersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- West Virginia Child Abuse Network Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Knot Today Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
77% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER?
- CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,456,903 to it, the largest being WINDERMERE FOUNDATION ($1,178,750). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $1,456,903 in grants to CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER?
- WINDERMERE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,178,750 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CHILDREN'S JUSTICE& ADVOCACY CENTER find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing