Skip to content
Blue Envelope Health Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Blue Envelope Health Fund

Financial medical assistance

$164k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$774kPublic Safety & Disaster$153kHousing & Shelter$53kFood & Nutrition$51kHuman Services$27kPublic Benefit$20kEducation$19kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $133,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $164,109 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,859 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION$24,000
MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC$15,000
CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICE$15,000
YOUTH CRISIS CENTER$15,000
NATRONA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$11,000
CAMP HOPE$10,000
WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE$10,000
UNACCOMPANIED STUDENT INITIATIVE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FAMILY PRACTICE$9,250
IRIS CLUBHOUSE$8,000
JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE: $17k → 11%WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE: $10k → 11%WYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE: $5k → 11%CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICE: $30k → 11%CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICE: $15k → 11%CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICE: $6k → 11%JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%INTERFAITH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$978k · 18 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
15

Total granted

$978k
$205k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+15%

Still filing today

83%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATRONA COLLECTIVE HEALTH TRUST
    6× · 2017–2022 · $114k · revenue +691% · 46% of their budget
  • OC
    OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $112k · revenue +82%
  • CW
    CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS
    5× · 2017–2023 · $102k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • BN
    BAR NUNN FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $33k
  • NC
    NATRONA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $33k
  • CO
    City of Casper Wyoming
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carbon County Counseling Center

To provide professional counseling services related primarily to mental health and substance abuse to the residents of Carbon County, Wyoming.

—
2
Wyoming Cares Inc

None

Human Services
3
Caring Foundation of Wyoming
Human Services
4
Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii
Health
5
Wyoming Community Hospital Foundation

To raise funds on behalf of the wyoming county community hospital.

—
6
Wyoming Health Resources Network Inc

To improve and enhance rural health services and promote healthier individuals and communities in wyoming.

Health
7
Wyoming County Community Health Fou

The Wyoming County Community Health Foundation identifies, selects, and invests in programs and Organizations that will improve the health and wellness of people in Wyoming County and surrounding communities.

Health
8
Wyoming Assn of Non Profit Organizations dba Wyoming Nonprofit Network

The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.

Philanthropy
9
Wrap Around Wyoming Inc

Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…

—
10
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
11
Mental Health & Recovery Services of Jackson Hole

Promoting mental wellness and providing essential mental health services in teton county regardless of a persons ability to pay.

—
12
Serve Wyoming Inc

The strengthen Wyoming communities by fostering a spirit of service and volunteerism among citizens of all ages and carry out a national service program as authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Center of Central Wyoming Inc; the most unlike its peers is Natrona Collective Health Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATRONA COLLECTIVE HEALTH TRUST: $113,648 · HealthNATRONA COLLECTIVE HEALTH TRUSTOLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC: $112,000 · HealthOLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INCCENTRAL WYOMING COUNSELING CENTER: $76,199 · HealthCENTRAL WYOMING COUNSELING CENTERMERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $67,900 · HealthMERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INCCAMP HOPE INC: $60,500 · HealthCAMP HOPE INCIris House Inc: $53,000 · HealthIris House Inc+1 more: $10,000 · HealthCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS: $102,428 · OtherCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONSIndividual grant recipient: $56,789 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $39,531 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAR NUNN FIRE DEPARTMENT: $32,994 · OtherBAR NUNN FIRE DEPARTMENTNATRONA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $32,771 · OtherNATRONA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENTWYOMING HEALTH FAIRS: $30,960 · OtherWYOMING HEALTH FAIRSUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: $27,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WYOMINGCity of Casper Wyoming: $19,873 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · Other+9 more: $84,439 · Other+9 moreWyoming Dementia Care: $46,000 · Housing & ShelterWyoming D…YOUTH CRISIS CENTER: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH CRI…UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterUNACCOMPA…CENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICES INC: $51,358 · Human ServicesWYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC: $31,500 · Human ServicesJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesInterfaith of Natrona County Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesCASPER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $42,000 · Community ImprovementCASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $19,445 · EducationNICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMeals on Wheels Foundation: $5,500 · Food & Nutrition
Health$493,247Other$444,535Housing & Shelter$101,000Human Services$93,858Community Improvement$42,000Education$19,445Arts & Culture$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATRONA COLLECTIVE HEALTH TRUST: $113,648 over 6y, 46% of budgetOLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC: $112,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetCENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS: $102,428 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL WYOMING COUNSELING CENTER: $76,199 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $67,900 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCAMP HOPE INC: $60,500 over 8y, 12% of budgetIris House Inc: $53,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetCENTRAL WYOMING SENIOR SERVICES INC: $51,358 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetWyoming Dementia Care: $46,000 over 3y, 53% of budgetYOUTH CRISIS CENTER: $45,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCASPER ROTARY FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 3y, 46% of budgetWYOMING FOUNDATION FOR CANCER CARE INC: $31,500 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetWYOMING HEALTH FAIRS: $30,960 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $19,445 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL SKI PATROL SYSTEM INC: $13,173 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetArc of Natrona County: $11,015 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF CENTRAL WYOMING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNICOLAYSEN ART MUSEUM: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels Foundation: $5,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNatrona County Public Library Foundation: $5,356 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSelf Help Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetInterfaith of Natrona County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community Fou…The McMurry FoundationNatrona Collective He…Zimmerman Family Foun…United Way of Natrona…First Interstate Banc…Double 4 FoundationWold FoundationThe John P Ellbogen F…Skelton Myra F Founda…The Goodstein Foundat…Masterson Family Foun…
Wyoming Community FoundationWY44× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · Zimmerman Family Foundation · United Way of Natrona County · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Double 4 Foundation · Wold Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Skelton Myra F Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · Masterson Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blue Envelope Health Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blue Envelope Health Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blue Envelope Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home