Skip to content
Blossom Hill Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Blossom Hill Foundation Inc

Blossom Hill Foundation funds innovative ideas to help children affected by conflict in the Middle East.

$403k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$133k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.1MEducation$715kHuman Services$132kYouth Development$105kEnvironment$53kHealth$43kArts & Culture$15k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$356k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Social Good Fund$132,500
Code to Inspire$52,500
Azraq Educatn Community Fund$50,000
The Guilford College$48,095
Omid Foundation USA$20,000
Internl Network Aid Relief$20,000
Collateral Repair Project$20,000
Project Soar Marrakech$15,000
Travler Pack$15,000
SYE Initiative Inc$15,000
Turkish Philanthropy Funds$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Travler Pack: $15k → 14%Friends of El Sistema Greece: $25k → 14%Friends of El Sistema Greece: $24k → 14%Friends of El Sistema Greece: $20k → 14%Friends of El Sistema Greece: $20k → 14%Friends of El Sistema Greece: $19k → 14%Friends of El Sistema Greece: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
NY
PA
CA
MD
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 13 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against -77% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$1.3M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
-77%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AZRAQ EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY FUND INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $327k · revenue +53%
  • CT
    Code to Inspire Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $243k · revenue +189% · 37% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF EL SISTEMA GREECE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $117k · revenue +235%

Funded once

  • NL
    NAVIGATOR LABS FKA GOORU
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -87%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GLOBAL VOICES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -77% · 36% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Voice
—
2
Galavante in the World Foundation
International
3
Ideas Beyond Borders Inc

Ideas beyond borders is a nonprofit with special consultative status to the united nations. we are committed to upholding critical thinking, science and civil rights in the greater middle east region.

International
4
Conversations Unbound

We empower forcibly displaced people as paid online conversation partners for students around the world. We provide a robust educational experience for students to improve their foreign language skills, engage in rich cross-cultural…

Education
5
Sahar Education

Sahar Education Sahar partners with Afghan based organizations to build schools and create educational opportunities for girls in Afghanistan empowering and inspiring children and their families to build peaceful and thriving communities.

International
6
Society for International Development Sid

Education and scientific contribution to development issues. More specifically to: (a)Encourage, support and facilitate the creation at the local, national, regional and international level of a sense of community amongst individuals and…

International
7
Jusoor

Our mission is to engage syrians living abroad in projects that will unlock the potential of syria's economy and enhance the livelihood of syria's citizens. we are one of the largest, most talented and dedicated expatriate communities in…

Education
8
Global Entrepreneurship Network

The global entrepreneurship network operates programs in 180 countries aimed at making it easier for anyone, anywhere to start and scale a business. by fostering deeper cross-border collaboration between entrepreneurs, researchers,…

Education
9
Open Transformation Lab Inc

The missions is to provide information and resources to counter disinformation, propaganda, and offer a window to trusted content about the events that are going on in the Middle East.

Science & Tech
10
Scholars At Risk Inc

Scholars at risk (sar) is an international network of institutions and individuals whose mission it is to protect scholars, promote academic freedom, and defend everyone's freedom to think, question and share ideas.

International
11
Siamak Pourzand Foundation

To promote freedom of expression to offer skill-building educational and knowledge-sharing platform for creative minds who struggle against censorship and repression to enhance and strengthen the cutlural educational charitable civic and…

International
12
Equality Now Inc

To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Azraq Education and Community Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of El Sistema Greece. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $512,263 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INCGUILFORD COLLEGE: $88,095 · EducationGUILFORD COLLEGESYE INITIATIVE INC: $75,000 · EducationSYE INITIATIVE INCUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT: $65,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENTNAVIGATOR LABS FKA GOORU: $50,000 · EducationNAVIGATOR LABS FKA GOORUCode to Inspire Inc: $242,500 · InternationalCode to Inspire IncTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $175,000 · InternationalTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INCPARSA: $80,000 · InternationalPARSACOLLATERAL REPAIR PROJECT: $70,000 · InternationalCOLLATERAL REPAIR PROJECT+2 more: $40,000 · International+2 moreTHE AZRAQ EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY FUND INC: $327,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AZRAQ EDUCATI…FRIENDS OF EL SISTEMA GREECE: $116,750 · Human ServicesTRAVLERPACK: $15,000 · Human ServicesRe Coded Co: $105,050 · Youth DevelopmentProject Soar Marrakech: $47,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $15,000 · OtherMarhub International: $10,000 · OtherA GLOBAL VOICE FOR AUTISM INC: $43,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF GLOBAL VOICES INC: $25,000 · OtherAL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE: $15,000 · OtherSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $52,500 · Environment
Education$790,358International$607,500Philanthropy$327,000Human Services$131,750Youth Development$105,050Other$155,500Environment$52,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $512,263 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AZRAQ EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY FUND INC: $327,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetCode to Inspire Inc: $242,500 over 7y, 37% of budgetTURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC: $175,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF EL SISTEMA GREECE: $116,750 over 6y, 24% of budgetRe Coded Co: $105,050 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE: $88,095 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARSA: $80,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSYE INITIATIVE INC: $75,000 over 6y, 54% of budgetCOLLATERAL REPAIR PROJECT: $70,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT: $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNAVIGATOR LABS FKA GOORU: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetA GLOBAL VOICE FOR AUTISM INC: $43,000 over 2y, 86% of budgetFRIENDS OF GLOBAL VOICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOMID FOUNDATION USA: $20,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetAL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTRAVLERPACK: $15,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA6.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blossom Hill Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blossom Hill Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blossom Hill Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Blossom Hill Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blossom Hill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home