· Public charity
Blossom Hill Foundation Inc
Blossom Hill Foundation funds innovative ideas to help children affected by conflict in the Middle East.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $163k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Social Good Fund | $132,500 |
| Code to Inspire | $52,500 |
| Azraq Educatn Community Fund | $50,000 |
| The Guilford College | $48,095 |
| Internl Network Aid Relief | $20,000 |
| Omid Foundation USA | $20,000 |
| Collateral Repair Project | $20,000 |
| Project Soar Marrakech | $15,000 |
| Travler Pack | $15,000 |
| SYE Initiative Inc | $15,000 |
| Turkish Philanthropy Funds | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against -77% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE AZRAQ EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY FUND INC6× · 2018–2024 · $327k · revenue +53%
- CTCode to Inspire Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $243k · revenue +189% · 37% of their budget
- FOFRIENDS OF EL SISTEMA GREECE6× · 2018–2023 · $117k · revenue +235%
Funded once
- NLNAVIGATOR LABS FKA GOORUone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -87%
- FOFRIENDS OF GLOBAL VOICES INCone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -77% · 36% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISone grant, 2018 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ideas beyond borders is a nonprofit with special consultative status to the united nations. we are committed to upholding critical thinking, science and civil rights in the greater middle east region.
We empower forcibly displaced people as paid online conversation partners for students around the world. We provide a robust educational experience for students to improve their foreign language skills, engage in rich cross-cultural…
Sahar Education Sahar partners with Afghan based organizations to build schools and create educational opportunities for girls in Afghanistan empowering and inspiring children and their families to build peaceful and thriving communities.
Education and scientific contribution to development issues. More specifically to: (a)Encourage, support and facilitate the creation at the local, national, regional and international level of a sense of community amongst individuals and…
Our mission is to engage syrians living abroad in projects that will unlock the potential of syria's economy and enhance the livelihood of syria's citizens. we are one of the largest, most talented and dedicated expatriate communities in…
The global entrepreneurship network operates programs in 180 countries aimed at making it easier for anyone, anywhere to start and scale a business. by fostering deeper cross-border collaboration between entrepreneurs, researchers,…
The missions is to provide information and resources to counter disinformation, propaganda, and offer a window to trusted content about the events that are going on in the Middle East.
Scholars at risk (sar) is an international network of institutions and individuals whose mission it is to protect scholars, promote academic freedom, and defend everyone's freedom to think, question and share ideas.
To promote freedom of expression to offer skill-building educational and knowledge-sharing platform for creative minds who struggle against censorship and repression to enhance and strengthen the cutlural educational charitable civic and…
To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Azraq Education and Community Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of El Sistema Greece. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE AZRAQ EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Code to Inspire Inc ↗
- Who funds TURKISH PHILANTHROPY FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF EL SISTEMA GREECE ↗
- Who funds Re Coded Co ↗
- Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PARSA ↗
- Who funds SYE INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds COLLATERAL REPAIR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT SAINT VINCENT ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NAVIGATOR LABS FKA GOORU ↗
- Who funds A GLOBAL VOICE FOR AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GLOBAL VOICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds OMID FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds TRAVLERPACK ↗
- Who funds AL-BUSTAN SEEDS OF CULTURE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Blossom Hill Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Blossom Hill Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Blossom Hill Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.