Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$98kCrime & Legal$68kYouth Development$58kArts & Culture$53kHousing & Shelter$43kHealth$38kEducation$25kCommunity Improvement$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE SUPPLY CO$7,500
DALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC$7,500
DALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$7,500
TRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER$7,500
VICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAT$7,500
GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC$7,500
PARTNERS INC$7,500
ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION$7,500
OUT TEACH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER: $8k → 14%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 14%JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $5k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $5k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $5k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $8k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $8k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $8k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$353k · 16 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$353k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

81%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +6%
  • GH
    GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +53%
  • WC
    WILKINSON CENTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $23k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SS
    ST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -84%
  • RR
    RAINBOW ROOM PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • ME
    MUSEUM EXPERIENCE FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Services

The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.

—
2
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
3
Greater Dallas Momentum Foundation
Community Improvement
4
Child Poverty Action Lab

The child poverty action lab exists to reduce child poverty in dallas by 50% within a single generation.

—
5
COMMIT2DALLAS

Our mission is that by 2040, at least half of all 25 to 34 year old residents of Dallas County, irrespective of race, will earn a living wage. Together, we cultivate a collaborative educational ecosystem with school systems, higher…

Education
6
Dallas Center Inc

To provide individualized services that positively impact the lives of 0-3 year old children with developmental disabilities/delays and their families.

Human Services
7
Downtown Dallas Inc Foundation

Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…

Community Improvement
8
Dallas Innovation Alliance

The Dallas Innovation Alliance (DIA) is a 501(c)(3) public-private consortium of public, private, civic and academia to support smart city initiatives in Dallas. Our definition of a Smart City is one at the intersection of community, data…

Community Improvement
9
Dallas Kids First

Dallas kids first elevates dialogue on the impact of school board leadership for kids in dallas isd and supports school board elections with focus on outcomes for kids.

Human Services
10
The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services
11
Head Start of Greater Dallas Inc

Head start of greater dallas, inc. provides children with the foundation of skills and knowledge they need to be successful in school and life and fosters self-reliant families and communities.

Education
12
Community Innovation Partners

To support and sustain the dallas community and the surrounding area through educational opportunities that emphasize innovation, creativity, and individualized learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Essilor Vision Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/23
Grantees still filing
11/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION: $35,000 · OtherADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATIO…CLAYTON DABNEY FOUNDATION FOR: $20,000 · OtherCLAYTON DABNEY FOUNDATION FORCHILDCAREGROUP: $20,000 · OtherCHILDCAREGROUPCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PART: $17,500 · OtherCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY P…ST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherRAINBOW ROOM PROGRAM: $7,500 · OtherMUSEUM EXPERIENCE FUND: $7,500 · OtherCLAYTON DABNEY FOUNDATION FOR KIDS WITH: $5,000 · OtherESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherDALLAS HOLOCAUST AND HUMAN RIGHTS: $5,000 · OtherFOREST FORWARD: $7,500 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY NORTH TEXAS: $5,000 · OtherHOPE SUPPLY CO: $42,500 · Human ServicesHOPE SUPPLY COJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesJUBILEE PARK & COMMU…VOGEL ALCOVE: $10,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVETRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesTRANSITION RESOURCE …CITYSQUARE: $5,000 · Human ServicesCITYSQUAREGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FO…OUT TEACH: $25,000 · EducationOUT TEACHWILKINSON CENTER: $22,500 · EducationWILKINSON CENTERVICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $22,500 · PhilanthropyVICKERY MEA…PARTNER INC: $22,500 · PhilanthropyPARTNER INCDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $20,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Ho…DALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureDALLAS CH…DALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS HI…DALLAS BLACK DANCE THEATRE INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS BL…PROMISE HOUSE INC: $17,500 · Housing & ShelterHOME POINT: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$142,500Human Services$80,000Education$80,000Philanthropy$45,000Arts & Culture$37,500Housing & Shelter$32,500Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $42,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOUT TEACH: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER: $22,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNER INC: $22,500 over 3y, 39% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDCAREGROUP: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE HOUSE INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOME POINT: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetFOREST FORWARD: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY NORTH TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS BLACK DANCE THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX31.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc · Capital for Kids · The Hersh Foundation · Dallas Mavericks Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat?

    Find your warmest path to Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph