· Private foundation
Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOPE SUPPLY CO | $7,500 |
| DALLAS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM | $7,500 |
| DALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC | $7,500 |
| TRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER | $7,500 |
| GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC | $7,500 |
| PARTNERS INC | $7,500 |
| ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION | $7,500 |
| VICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDAT | $7,500 |
| OUT TEACH | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +6%
- GHGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +53%
- PIPARTNER INC3× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +10% · 39% of their budget
Funded once
- SSST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -84%
- RRRAINBOW ROOM PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · $8k
- FFFOREST FORWARDgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +447%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Dallas Services is to enable individuals with disabilities and other special needs to achieve their potential by fostering community inclusiveness and independence.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
The child poverty action lab exists to reduce child poverty in dallas by 50% within a single generation.
Our mission is that by 2040, at least half of all 25 to 34 year old residents of Dallas County, irrespective of race, will earn a living wage. Together, we cultivate a collaborative educational ecosystem with school systems, higher…
To provide individualized services that positively impact the lives of 0-3 year old children with developmental disabilities/delays and their families.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…
The Dallas Innovation Alliance (DIA) is a 501(c)(3) public-private consortium of public, private, civic and academia to support smart city initiatives in Dallas. Our definition of a Smart City is one at the intersection of community, data…
Dallas kids first elevates dialogue on the impact of school board leadership for kids in dallas isd and supports school board elections with focus on outcomes for kids.
To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.
Head start of greater dallas, inc. provides children with the foundation of skills and knowledge they need to be successful in school and life and fosters self-reliant families and communities.
To support and sustain the dallas community and the surrounding area through educational opportunities that emphasize innovation, creativity, and individualized learning.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Essilor Vision Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION ↗
- Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OUT TEACH ↗
- Who funds PARTNER INC ↗
- Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds VICKERY MEADOW YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDCAREGROUP ↗
- Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
- Who funds PROMISE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOME POINT ↗
- Who funds NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE ↗
- Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
- Who funds TRANSITION RESOURCE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST SIMON'S AFTER-SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDRENS THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds FOREST FORWARD ↗
- Who funds DALLAS BLACK DANCE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CITYSQUARE ↗
- Who funds DALLAS HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ESSILOR VISION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc · Capital for Kids · The Hersh Foundation · Dallas Mavericks Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat?
Find your warmest path to Blewett Alice E and Jos C Foundat through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.