Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blankinship 1991 Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$181kHuman Services$158kHealth$76kEducation$43kArts & Culture$39kFood & Nutrition$19kCommunity Improvement$11kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$30,500
MANOR PARK$20,000
MIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION$5,000
PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM$5,000
WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK$4,000
HALEY MEMORIAL LIBRARY$2,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,500
SENIOR LIFE OF MIDLAND$2,000
HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH$2,000
THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER$2,000
SAMARTAN COUNSELING CENTER$1,500
NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER$1,500
MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $2k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $2k → 14%MANOR PARK INC: $50k → 12%MANOR PARK: $23k → 12%MANOR PARK: $20k → 12%MANOR PARK: $13k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $9k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $6k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $6k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $6k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $3k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $2k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $1k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$494k · 24 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$494k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+182%

Still filing today

58%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CulturePublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    MANOR PARK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $127k · revenue +49%
  • MC
    MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +93%
  • WT
    WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • PB
    PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEM
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CF
    CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +63%
  • MH
    MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +252%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midland Community Healthcare Services Inc

Midland community healthcare services provides affordable, comprehensive, accessible, culturally appropriate, cost-effect, primary healthcare services to residents mainly in midland county.

Health
2
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
3
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
4
Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc

Care, hope, and support for all when illness threatens life.

Human Services
5
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
6
Midland County Public Library Foundation

To support and enhance the operations, acquisitions, and funding of projects and programs that encourage lifelong learning through the Midland County Public Library System.

Education
7
Panhandle Independent Living Center

Panhandle Independent Living Center is a nonprofit corporation dedicated to the advancement of full participation of individuals with disabilities in all aspects of life.

Human Services
8
Reece Endeavor of Midland

To meet the growing housing needs of people with special needs throughout Midland County - we want to offer them stability and affordability and help them become integrated into the community.

Philanthropy
9
Permian Basin Rehabilitation Center

Improving lives by providing exceptional and compassionate therapy services.

Health
10
Midland County Cancer Society Dba Cancer Services

To provide personal and compassionate support to cancer patients and their caregivers in our community.

—
11
Vail House Midland Inc

To provide high quality, individualized care and community inclusion for the people we serve so they can have full and happy lives.

Health
12
Fort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and Much Much More

See Schedule OFort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels provides comprehensive services, including Meals on Wheels, congregate meals, transportation, case management, health screenings, information and referral services, recreation, and more. Our…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Health Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $150,400 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $39,000 · OtherMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONFIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $30,500 · OtherFIRST METHODIST CHURCHPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM: $27,370 · OtherPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUMWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $18,500 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANKMARC INC: $11,500 · OtherTHE HALEY MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $11,000 · Other+17 more: $34,400 · Other+17 moreMANOR PARK INC: $127,300 · Human ServicesMANOR PARK INCSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC+3 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $27,500 · EducationAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $10,000 · EducationRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $13,700 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,000 · HealthMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $2,000 · HealthMISSION HEALTH CARE INC: $1,250 · HealthMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST: $9,000 · Arts & CultureMidland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc: $500 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND HUMANE COALITION INC: $5,000 · AnimalsPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION: $2,250 · PhilanthropyTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $2,250 · Public Benefit
Other$322,670Human Services$146,300Education$40,000Health$18,950Arts & Culture$9,500Animals$5,000Philanthropy$2,250Public Benefit$2,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMANOR PARK INC: $127,300 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $18,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $13,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARC INC: $11,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND HUMANE COALITION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION HEALTH CARE INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC ↗
  • Who funds APHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND HUMANE COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Midland-Odessa Symphony & Chorale Inc ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger FoundationTX45.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Warren Charitable Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Beal Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Fmh Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blankinship 1991 Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blankinship 1991 Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Blankinship 1991 Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Blankinship 1991 Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blankinship 1991’s filings →

More from the funding graph