Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blanche C Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$317k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$979kInternational$677kHuman Services$542kPhilanthropy$88kFood & Nutrition$56kYouth Development$54kArts & Culture$50kHealth$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $207k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMFED$125,000
COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$82,400
VAIL VALLEY CARES$32,055
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO$24,950
MINDS MATTER COLORADO$10,000
MOUNTAIN FILM$10,000
SWIFT EAGLE FOUNDATION$10,000
PBS FOUNDATION$5,000
VAIL VALLEY CARES$5,000
BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
COLORADO SKI MUSEUM$1,500
THE WORLD$1,000
WILKINSON PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
WYOMING NATUROPATHIC PHYSICIANS ASSOC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $535k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DZI FOUNDATION: $119k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $98k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $51k → 7%EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND: $15k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND: $15k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $50k → 7%EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND: $10k → 7%EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND: $10k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CARES: $32k → 7%EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $25k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CARES: $5k → 7%VAIL VALLEY CARES: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
WY
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 21 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
15

Total granted

$2.2M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+16%

Still filing today

57%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $631k · revenue +34%
  • CU
    CAMFED USA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $575k · revenue +63%
  • DF
    DZI FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $417k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • WF
    WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +2%
  • CM
    COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FD
    one grant, 2018 · $84k
  • GO
    GIRLS ON FIRE LEADERS
    one grant, 2022 · $54k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elevations Credit Union

Together we create solutions for a better life.

—
2
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
3
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
4
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
5
Colorado Music Festival & Center for Musical Arts

To inspire and connect community members of all ages by providing access to the best of the world's music through education and performance.

Arts & Culture
6
Colorado Farm Bureau

To advance the interest of the colorado farm and ranch community. activities include research and inquiry into the fields of agriculture, industry, commerce, transportation, economic and political relations.

—
7
Energize Colorado Inc

We foster resiliency in underinvested business communities across colorado by innovatively addressing capital gaps. at energize colorado, we envision a future where we are the go-to destination for business owners seeking comprehensive…

Community Improvement
8
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
9
Colorado Music Bridge

Colorado nbsp;music nbsp;bridge nbsp;provides nbsp;access nbsp;to nbsp;inclusive nbsp;modern nbsp;music nbsp;education nbsp;programs nbsp;curricular nbsp;resources nbsp;and nbsp;professional nbsp;development

Arts & Culture
10
Colorado Fiscal Institute

To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity

Community Improvement
11
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
12
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountainfilm; the most unlike its peers is Women for Women International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $630,600 · OtherCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FD: $83,800 · OtherCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FDGIRLS ON FIRE LEADERS: $54,000 · OtherGIRLS ON FIRE LEADERSSWIFT EAGLE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Other+26 more: $135,892 · Other+26 moreCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $575,000 · InternationalCAMFED USA FOUNDATIONWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL+1 more: $1,617 · InternationalDZI FOUNDATION: $417,167 · Human ServicesDZI FOUNDATIONEAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND: $50,000 · Human ServicesEAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSI…Vail Valley Cares: $42,420 · Human ServicesVail Valley CaresEAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesLITERACY PROJECT EC VOLUNTEERS FOR LITERACY: $204,783 · EducationLITERACY …FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $55,500 · Food & NutritionSwift Eagle Charitable Foundation: $27,500 · PhilanthropyEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyThe Mountain Spirits Fund Inc: $3,000 · PhilanthropyMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $45,000 · Youth Development
Other$949,292International$676,617Human Services$534,587Education$204,783Food & Nutrition$55,500Philanthropy$45,500Youth Development$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $630,600 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION: $575,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetDZI FOUNDATION: $417,167 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetLITERACY PROJECT EC VOLUNTEERS FOR LITERACY: $204,783 over 4y, 21% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $55,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND: $50,000 over 4y, 60% of budgetMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $45,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetVail Valley Cares: $42,420 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSwift Eagle Charitable Foundation: $27,500 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetMOUNTAINFILM: $27,085 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetColorado Ski Museum Inc: $6,750 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mountain Spirits Fund Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetBUILDON INC: $1,617 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTELLURIDE COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMAN DBA TELLURIDE ARTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTelluride Mountain Club: $758 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $354 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAH HAA SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgeti AM Music Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY PROJECT EC VOLUNTEERS FOR LITERACY ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
  • Who funds MINDS MATTER COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds Vail Valley Cares ↗
  • Who funds Swift Eagle Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINFILM ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Ski Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Mountain Spirits Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds BUILDON INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds TELLURIDE COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMAN DBA TELLURIDE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA BOTANIC GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds Telluride Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO20× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Vail Valley Foundation · Kelton Family Foundation · Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · Telluride Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blanche C Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blanche C Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blanche C Hill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph