Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bisco Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$658k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.4MEducation$751kHuman Services$262kInternational$253kHealth$241kReligion$177kCommunity Improvement$96kPhilanthropy$88kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TSURUMI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENISTRY$250,000
KOREAN CULTURAL CENTER OF CHICAGO$200,000
KOREAN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO$25,000
DA-IL COMMUNITY OF USA$20,000
SEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$20,000
FIRST KOREAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
COMPREHENSIVE KOREAN SELF HELP COMMUNITY CENTER$12,000
ROTARY CLUB OF CHICAGOLAND KOREAN-NORTHBROOK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
UNITED METHODIST COMMITTEE ON RELIEF$10,000
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$10,000
SEJONG CULTURAL SOCIETY$10,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EUGENE BELL FOUNDATION: $5k → 26%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%EUGENE BELL FOUNDATION: $5k → 26%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%EUGENE BELL FOUNDATION: $5k → 26%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%EUGENE BELL FOUNDATION: $1k → 26%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%EUGENE BELL FOUNDATION: $1k → 26%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 8%HANUL FAMILY ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%HANUL FAMILY ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%HANUL FAMILY ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $5k → 14%KOREAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%KOREAN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%KOREAN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%KOREAN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
CA
VA
MD
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Bisco Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Bisco Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 35 repeat orgs$506k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
5

Total granted

$2.4M
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-21%

Still filing today

51%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $283k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KOREAN CULTURAL CENTER OF CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +306% · 38% of their budget
  • KA
    KOREAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO
    4× · 2020–2024 · $185k · revenue +3% · 26% of their budget
  • DC
    DUREH COMMUNITY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +219% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • IF
    INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SKK UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $110k · revenue -38% · 46% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOR PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unification of Korea Academic Resea

Comparative studies and research concerning the political, economic, social, and cultural barriers and ties among the usa,south korea and north korea.

Arts & Culture
2
Korean Senior Citizens Association of San Fernando Valley
Recreation & Sports
3
Hawaii Korean Chamber of Commerce Foundation

To promote and strengthen our diverse community by educating present and future generations in the evolving korean-american experience in hawaii.

Civil Rights
4
The Korean Library Foundation
Education
5
International Foundation for Korea University Inc

To provide educational and charitable support to community and korea university

International
6
Korean American United Foundation
—
7
Korean-American Community Foundation Inc

Kacf provides grants and capacity building assistance to organizations working to address the most pressing needs in the korean american community and beyond. to the supporters, kacf provides a way to magnify the impact of their giving and…

Philanthropy
8
Korean American Community Foundation of San Francisco

The korean american community foundation of san francisco uplifts and connects the korean-american community through philanthropy.

Human Services
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Chamber Opera of Chicago
—
11
Korean American Culture and Arts Inc

To expand cultural exchange through exhibitions, performances, fashion shows,culinary events, distribution of publications, and other artistic endeavors between korea and the united states

Arts & Culture
12
Hye-Ryeong Kim Memorial Scholarship Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Korean Cultural Center of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is International Foundation for Skk University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOREAN CULTURAL CENTER OF CHICAGO: $1,221,000 · Arts & CultureKOREAN CULTURAL CENTER OF CHICAGO+4 more: $116,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreTSURUMI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENISTRY: $250,000 · OtherTSURUMI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL O…UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOR PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOR …NAPERVILLE KOREAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherNAPERVILLE KOREAN UNITED ME…FIRST KOREAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherKSEA SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $31,000 · OtherGARRETT EVANGELICAL THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF CHICAGOLAND KOREAN-NORTHBROOK CHARITABLE PROJECTS FOUNDATION: $88,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF CHICAGOLAND …+20 more: $212,000 · Other+20 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SKK UNIVERSITY INC: $110,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL F…Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc: $20,000 · EducationSEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $19,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationKOREAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $185,000 · Human ServicesKOREAN AME…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL CHI…Eugene Bell Foundation Inc: $17,000 · Human ServicesEugene Bel…HANUL FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A THE KOREAN-AMERICAN SR CTR: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesDAIL COMMUNITY OF USA INC: $200,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalMAYO CLINIC: $130,000 · HealthDUREH COMMUNITY CENTER: $96,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$1,337,000Other$816,000Education$474,000Human Services$308,000International$211,000Health$130,000Community Improvement$96,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOREAN CULTURAL CENTER OF CHICAGO: $1,221,000 over 8y, 38% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAIL COMMUNITY OF USA INC: $200,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $185,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SKK UNIVERSITY INC: $110,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetDUREH COMMUNITY CENTER: $96,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF CHICAGOLAND KOREAN-NORTHBROOK CHARITABLE PROJECTS FOUNDATION: $88,000 over 8y, 66% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSEJONG CULTURAL SOCIETY: $40,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetAssociated Colleges of Illinois Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEugene Bell Foundation Inc: $17,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetHANUL FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A THE KOREAN-AMERICAN SR CTR: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO: $15,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER OF CONCERN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNK Missions Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOREAN CULTURAL CENTER OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAIL COMMUNITY OF USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SKK UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds DUREH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF CHICAGOLAND KOREAN-NORTHBROOK CHARITABLE PROJECTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SEJONG CULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEVERANCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Eugene Bell Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HANUL FAMILY ALLIANCE F/K/A THE KOREAN-AMERICAN SR CTR ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bisco Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bisco Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bisco Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bisco Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bisco’s filings →

    More from the funding graph