Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Birtwistle Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$356kEducation$311kPhilanthropy$133kHuman Services$47kRecreation & Sports$46kCrime & Legal$43kYouth Development$41kHealth$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MASON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$30,000
MASON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$30,000
FRIENDS OF LUDINGTON STATE PARK$20,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
LUDINGTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
UNITED WAY OF MASON COUNTY$2,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MASON COUNTY$2,000
LUDINGTON YOUTH SAILING SCHOOL INC$2,000
LUDINGTON PETUNIA PARADE$1,500
SANDCASTLE CHILDRENS MUSEUM$1,500
WEST SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $2k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $2k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $2k → 10%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $30k → 21%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $2k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $1k → 10%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WI
MI
NY
SD
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$847k · 44 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
14

Total granted

$847k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+20%

Still filing today

34%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LUDINGTON AREA ARTS COUNCIL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +70%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +23%
  • GP
    GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • MC
    Methodist Children's Home Society
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +20%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
  • LC
    LAKESHORE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
2
Memorial Healthcare Foundation

Through fund development, we serve our community by assisting memorial healthcare achieve its mission to promote health and provide quality compassionate healthcare in the shiawassee region.

Education
3
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
4
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
5
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
6
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
7
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
8
Michigan State Medical Society Foundation

To advance the field of health for the public good.

9
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

10
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
11
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
12
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild and Family ServicesLand Conservation Organizat…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…United Way FederationsVeteran Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Christian Youth CampsHospice Care ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr15%23%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr18%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr14%4%35–55yr18%72%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,826

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LUDINGTON MARITIME MUSEUM — $100,000 · OtherLUDINGTON MARITIME MUSEUMLUDINGTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $47,500 · OtherLUDINGTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTMASON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherMASON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $22,000 · Other+32 more — $247,525 · Other+32 moreMASON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $205,500 · Arts & CultureMASON COUNTY HISTORICAL …LUDINGTON AREA ARTS COUNCIL — $13,500 · Arts & CultureLUDINGTON AREA ARTS COUN…PERE MARQUETTE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION — $8,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…FRIENDS OF LUDINGTON STATE PARK — $20,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS O…UNITED WAY OF MASON COUNTY — $15,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…+3 more — $3,500 · PhilanthropyMethodist Children's Home Society — $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $12,000 · Human ServicesGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $10,500 · Human ServicesHospice of Michigan Inc — $2,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,250 · Human ServicesAmerican Diabetes Association — $10,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $6,200 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,500 · Health+2 more — $1,000 · HealthWEST SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $11,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationLAKESHORE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$614,525Arts & Culture$227,500Philanthropy$88,500Human Services$55,750Health$19,200Education$17,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMASON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $205,500 over 8y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMethodist Children's Home Society — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF LUDINGTON STATE PARK — $20,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MASON COUNTY — $15,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetLUDINGTON AREA ARTS COUNCIL — $13,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESHORE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLudington Youth Sailing School Inc — $9,625 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetPERE MARQUETTE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION — $8,500 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $6,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOME TEAM HOUSING — $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $5,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND HAVEN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MASON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY
  • Who funds Methodist Children's Home Society
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LUDINGTON STATE PARK
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MASON COUNTY
  • Who funds LUDINGTON AREA ARTS COUNCIL
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds WEST SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association
  • Who funds GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds LAKESHORE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds Ludington Youth Sailing School Inc
  • Who funds PERE MARQUETTE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Muskegon CountyMI28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Pennies From Heaven Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Birtwistle Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph