Skip to content
Bill Shoshana Sgb Sheinberg Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Bill Shoshana Sgb Sheinberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$339kArts & Culture$80kInternational$17kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$250Religion$250Youth Development$100Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$110k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PITZER COLLEGE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
AMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%pan-mass challenge: $511 → 7%Armenian International Women's Association: $128 → 8%apostolic assembly: $250 → 11%HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: $10k → 14%Uganda Project: $25 → 11%HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: $5k → 17%american heart association: $250 → 14%Jewish Women International: $500 → 14%Cystic Fibrosis Foundation: $500 → 8%OMNI PEACE: $5k → 14%Human Rights Watch: $1k → 17%american heart association: $200 → 14%promises foundation: $250 → 14%girl scouts of america: $50 → 17%UCLA FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%The UCLA Foundation: $10k → 14%PITZER COLLEGE: $30k → 14%PITZER COLLEGE: $25k → 14%PITZER COLLEGE: $25k → 14%pitzer college: $25k → 14%pitzer college: $25k → 14%pitzer college: $25k → 14%pitzer college: $25k → 14%pitzer college: $25k → 14%AMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY: $22k → 14%american youth symphony: $13k → 14%american youth symphony: $12k → 14%american youth symphony: $11k → 14%TREE ACADEMY: $11k → 14%american youth symphony: $10k → 14%tree academy: $10k → 14%american youth symphony: $10k → 14%TREE ACADEMY: $10k → 14%AMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY: $500 → 14%TREE ACADEMY: $10k → 14%LA LAWYERS PHILHARMONIC: $1k → 14%AMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY: $350 → 14%blind children's center: $825 → 14%THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $100 → 14%park century school: $56k → 14%Blind Children's Center: $660 → 14%Harold Robinson Foundation: $50 → 14%park century school: $250 → 14%blind children's center: $363 → 14%Los Angeles Museum: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$400k · 7 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$400k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-4%

Still filing today

86%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    Pitzer College
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +49%
  • PC
    PARK CENTURY SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $56k · revenue +11%
  • TA
    TREE ACADEMY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $41k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • CS
    Cure Sanfilippo Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -37%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • LA
    Los Angeles Museum
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
9
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
10
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
11
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
12
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Early Education; the most unlike its peers is Armenian International Women's Associati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pitzer College: $205,000 · EducationPitzer CollegePARK CENTURY SCHOOL: $56,475 · EducationPARK CENTURY SCHOOLTREE ACADEMY: $40,628 · EducationTREE ACADEMYUCLA FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,948 · EducationAMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $79,240 · OtherAMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHON…Individual grant recipient: $4,500 · Other+7 more: $3,636 · OtherHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $16,000 · International+1 more: $128 · InternationalCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $5,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $450 · HealthTHE PROMISES FOUNDATION ATTN BRYAN MOELLER CHAIRMAN: $250 · PhilanthropyHAROLD ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50 · Youth Development
Education$339,051Other$87,376International$16,128Health$5,950Philanthropy$250Youth Development$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPitzer College: $205,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $79,240 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetPARK CENTURY SCHOOL: $56,475 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTREE ACADEMY: $40,628 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCure Sanfilippo Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $1,848 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $511 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Women International: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSOCIATI: $128 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAROLD ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California Community FoundationCA16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bill Shoshana Sgb Sheinberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bill Shoshana Sgb Sheinberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bill Shoshana Sgb Sheinberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home