Skip to content

· Private foundation

Betty Lewis Environmental Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$861kRecreation & Sports$124kAnimals$105kScience & Tech$31kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,939
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT$5,908
MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER$5,908
MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD$5,908
CONSERVATION CORPS$5,908
MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB$5,908
FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC$5,907
COMMON FIELD INC$5,064
FINGER LAKES LAND TRUST$5,064
CORNELL BOTANIC GARDENS$5,064
Individual grant recipient$5,064
FINGER LAKES TRAIL CONFERENCE$5,063
NORTH COUNTRY TRAIL ASSOC$5,063
ITHACA CHILDREN'S GARDEN INC$5,063
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$3,939
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$3,939
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $7k → 6%MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $7k → 11%FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $7k → 11%FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT: $7k → 13%CONSERVATION CORPS: $7k → 14%FINGER LAKES TRAIL CONFERENCE: $6k → 11%ITHACA CHILDREN'S GARDEN INC: $6k → 16%NORTH COUNTRY TRAIL ASSOC: $6k → 11%MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $6k → 6%MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $6k → 11%FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $6k → 11%FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT: $6k → 13%CONSERVATION CORPS: $6k → 14%CORNELL BOTANIC GARDENS: $6k → 16%MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $6k → 6%MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $6k → 11%FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $6k → 11%FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT: $6k → 13%CONSERVATION CORPS: $6k → 14%CORNELL ORNITHOLOGY LAB: $6k → 16%MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $6k → 6%MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $6k → 11%FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $6k → 11%FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT: $6k → 13%CONSERVATION CORPS: $6k → 14%FINGER LAKES LAND TRUST: $6k → 16%MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $6k → 6%MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $6k → 11%FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $6k → 11%FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT: $6k → 13%CONSERVATION CORPS: $6k → 14%MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $6k → 6%MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $6k → 11%FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $6k → 11%FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT: $6k → 13%CONSERVATION CORPS: $6k → 14%MARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $6k → 6%MINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $6k → 11%FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT: $6k → 13%CONSERVATION CORPS: $6k → 14%MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $7k → 11%MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $6k → 11%MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $6k → 11%MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $6k → 11%MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $6k → 11%MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $6k → 11%MARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $6k → 11%COMMON FIELD INC: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
MI
NY
OR
CA
UT
WV
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 35 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+108%

Still filing today

71%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONSERVATION CORPS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue +33%
  • FL
    FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $48k · revenue ×15
  • TF
    The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +172%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Cornell
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • MC
    Martin County Pheasants Forever
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • MC
    Martin County Conservation Club Inc.
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
2
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
3
Wild Landscapes Inc

Wild landscapes, inc. (wli) is dedicated to conserving large and connected landscapes globally significant to wildlife and crucial to local communities. our environmental conservation strategy is to empower communities, conservationists,…

Animals
4
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
5
National Wildlife Federation

Unite all americans to ensure wildlife thrives in a rapidly changing world.

Animals
6
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
9
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
10
Florida Conservation Group Inc

Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…

Environment
11
Pacific Crest Trail Association

The pacific crest trail association's mission is to advocate for the pacific crest trail as an inspirational outdoor experience, to connect people to the pct, and to conserve the trail.

—
12
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Corps; the most unlike its peers is Rainforest Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
26/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT INC: $48,412 · OtherFRIENDS OF WINDOM WETLAND DISTRICT INCFOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $48,410 · OtherFOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INCMARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVER: $42,471 · OtherMARTIN CTY PHEASANTS FOREVERMINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FD: $42,471 · OtherMINNESOTA MASTER NATURALIST END FDMARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUB: $42,470 · OtherMARTIN CTY CONSERVATION CLUBNORTH COUNTRY TRAIL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $41,495 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY TRAIL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATEDCOMMON FIELD INCORPORATED: $41,495 · OtherCOMMON FIELD INCORPORATEDCORNELL BOTANIC GARDENS: $36,404 · OtherCORNELL BOTANIC GARDENSIndividual grant recipient: $36,403 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $32,274 · OtherRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $28,311 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $20,748 · OtherTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $20,748 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $20,748 · Other+8 more: $68,940 · Other+8 moreCONSERVATION CORPS: $48,412 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION CORPSThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $41,495 · EnvironmentThe Finger Lakes Land Trust IncIthaca Childrens Garden Inc: $41,492 · EnvironmentIthaca Childrens Garden IncCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $32,276 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $32,275 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $32,275 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $32,272 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDEARTHJUSTICE: $28,315 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $28,313 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $20,748 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $20,748 · EnvironmentGreater Hells Canyon Council: $20,748 · EnvironmentSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $20,748 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARK TRUST INC: $20,748 · EnvironmentALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE: $20,748 · EnvironmentHARTLEY NATURE CENTER: $20,748 · EnvironmentSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $20,748 · EnvironmentRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $18,202 · Environment+2 more: $8,487 · EnvironmentFinger Lakes Trail Conference Inc: $41,494 · Recreation & SportsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $32,275 · Animals
Other$571,800Environment$509,798Recreation & Sports$41,494Animals$32,275

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSERVATION CORPS: $48,412 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $48,410 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetThe Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc: $41,495 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY TRAIL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $41,495 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFinger Lakes Trail Conference Inc: $41,494 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetIthaca Childrens Garden Inc: $41,492 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $32,276 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $32,275 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $32,275 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $32,275 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $32,274 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $32,272 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $28,315 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $28,313 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $28,311 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $20,748 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC: $20,748 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $20,748 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Hells Canyon Council: $20,748 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE: $20,748 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK TRUST INC: $20,748 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE: $20,748 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHARTLEY NATURE CENTER: $20,748 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $20,748 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $20,748 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $18,202 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMartin County Conservation Club Inc.: $5,941 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $2,546 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONSERVATION CORPS ↗
  • Who funds FOX LAKE CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Finger Lakes Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY TRAIL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Finger Lakes Trail Conference Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ithaca Childrens Garden Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Hells Canyon Council ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds HARTLEY NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Martin County Conservation Club Inc. ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT12.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Betty Lewis Environmental Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Betty Lewis Environmental Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • National Park Trust Inc: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Betty Lewis Environmental’s filings →

More from the funding graph