Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bershad Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$138kPhilanthropy$102kYouth Development$31kFood & Nutrition$24kHealth$16kInternational$16kCommunity Improvement$16kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$807k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$20,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER CHARLOTTE$5,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$2,500
STAND FOR ANIMALS$1,000
FATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER$1,000
VETERINARY CARE FOUNDATION$1,000
COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC$1,000
HIAS$1,000
THE TOWN SCHOOL$500
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$500
CHARLOTTE MECHKENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PROMISE686: $250 → 9%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $6k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT INC: $6k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT INC: $6k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT INC: $5k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $5k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $1k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $1k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
NC
DC
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$373k · 31 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
21

Total granted

$373k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+39%

Still filing today

61%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Cornell University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +59%
  • UJ
    United Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +154%
  • CL
    CHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OHR HA TORAH
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
2
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
12
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robin Hood Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and AdoptionJewish Community FederationsPublic Library SupportEarly Childhood Education C…Cancer Support OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesCommunity Health CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceEducation Equity LeadershipCommunity FoundationsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Independent K-8 SchoolsSenior Support ServicesAt-Risk Youth Mentoring
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cornell University — $87,750 · EducationCornell UniversityCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS — $30,250 · EducationCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS+4 more — $6,750 · Education+4 moreUnited Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc — $35,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Jewish Charities…SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $35,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERSUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FE…FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $5,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR THE CARO…ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $3,500 · PhilanthropyFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE — $13,500 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEIndividual grant recipient — $10,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENN STATE UNIVERSITY — $7,500 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYNJPAC — $6,000 · OtherNJPACTHE TOWN SCHOOL INC — $4,000 · OtherNorthwestern University — $10,250 · OtherNorthwestern UniversityFATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $10,500 · OtherFATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPT…VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE IN — $9,500 · OtherVOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE …Spay Neuter Charlotte — $6,000 · OtherSpay Neuter Charlotte+28 more — $32,600 · Other+28 moreCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $30,000 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $22,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $1,500 · Food & NutritionPENNPAC INC — $15,500 · Community ImprovementHIAS INC — $15,500 · International
Education$124,750Philanthropy$83,500Other$110,100Human Services$30,250Food & Nutrition$23,500Community Improvement$15,500International$15,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCornell University — $87,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc — $35,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $35,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS — $30,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $30,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPENNPAC INC — $15,500 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetHIAS INC — $15,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $10,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $10,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE IN — $9,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSpay Neuter Charlotte — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOWN SCHOOL INC — $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPUT ON THE BRAKES INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation of Shalom Park — $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORNELL HILLEL — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPromise686 Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharlotte Bilingual Learning Center — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds United Jewish Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds PENNPAC INC
  • Who funds HIAS INC
  • Who funds FATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE IN
  • Who funds Spay Neuter Charlotte
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS
  • Who funds THE TOWN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PUT ON THE BRAKES INC
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds THE GO PROJECT INC
  • Who funds EAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds The Foundation of Shalom Park

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · The Marc & Mattye Silverman Family Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · Foundation for the Charlotte Jewish Community · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Albemarle Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bershad Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • Volunteer Lawyers for Justice in9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bershad Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Bershad Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph