Skip to content

· Private foundation

Berru Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$189kReligion$124kInternational$72kEducation$42kPhilanthropy$28kHealth$220Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$958k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONNECTICUT COLLEGE$30,000
ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION$11,400
TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER$9,150
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$5,000
KAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADES$3,600
JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL$2,660
CONGREGATION BNAI ISRAEL OF FLEISC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $21k → 17%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $30k → 9%TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER: $21k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $17k → 17%CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $10k → 9%TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER: $12k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $15k → 17%TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER: $9k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $11k → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $13k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $10k → 17%KAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $4k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $10k → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $10k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $7k → 17%KAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $4k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $6k → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $8k → 7%JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL: $3k → 17%KAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $4k → 7%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE: $2k → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $3k → 7%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 17%JCC ON THE PALISADES: $2k → 7%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $11k → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $2k → 7%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%UJA FEDERATION: $10k → 7%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%JFCSNNJ: $17k → 7%ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%JFCSNNJ: $5k → 7%AFINS: $30k → 17%JFCSNNJ: $5k → 7%AFINS: $20k → 17%JFCSNNJ: $5k → 7%AFINS: $18k → 17%AFINS: $3k → 17%PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE: $8k → 17%PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE: $7k → 17%PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE: $6k → 17%PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE: $5k → 17%PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$439k · 12 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$439k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-6%

Still filing today

50%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JB
    JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +26%
  • ZC
    ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +14%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $70k · revenue +533%

Funded once

  • UF
    UJA FEDERATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • PC
    PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
5
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
6
Brown Hillel Foundation

Brown risd hillel encourages and supports a diversity of students as they explore, develop and deepen their jewish identities. we are committed to having judaism serve as a source of meaning and growth during their time on college hill and…

—
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Hillel Foundation of Cambridge Inc
Religion
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dwight-Englewood School; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Israeli Navy Seals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER INC: $42,578 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF CLOSTER INCTEMPLE EMANUEL: $35,460 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELJFCSNNJ: $32,360 · OtherJFCSNNJPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INC: $31,250 · OtherPARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE INCKAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $11,500 · OtherKAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADESUJA FEDERATION: $10,000 · OtherUJA FEDERATION+9 more: $8,865 · OtherJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC: $98,078 · Arts & CultureJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INCZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $73,120 · Arts & CultureZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC: $70,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS …CONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationCONNECTICU…+4 more: $1,695 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 · Health
Other$172,013Arts & Culture$171,198International$70,000Education$41,695Health$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC: $98,078 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $73,120 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC: $70,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,970 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH BOOK COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELI NAVY SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PURCHASE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DWIGHT-ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ELISABETH MORROW SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Berru Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Berru Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Berru’s filings →

More from the funding graph