Skip to content

Arizona · Private foundation

Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$231k
Granted FY2019
26
Grants FY2019
25
Organizations funded FY2019
16%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

92% of Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 12 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 20 organizations, $231k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
19
’18
20
’19
0
’20
22
’21
15
’22
15
’23
12
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2019
$29,000
Organizations funded a year
21 to 25
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
16
Total assets, FY2019
$3.2M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 16% of the organizations Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
InternationalHealthEnvironmentPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201925$211k16%
FY201824$184k33%
FY201721$177kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.5MAnimals$495kPublic Benefit$299kEnvironment$90kInternational$39kHuman Services$37kSocial Science$34kScience & Tech$34kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
TN
DC
HI
AL
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 32 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($327k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCato Institute: $199,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmphibian Ark: $160,000 over 7y, 19% of budgetJudicial Watch Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe David Sheldrick Wildlife Trust USA Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Veterinary Medical Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $31,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHimalayan Cataract Project Inc: $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSemper Fi & America's Fund: $26,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Independent Institute: $25,400 over 4y, 0.3% of budget4 Paws for Ability Inc: $24,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEmpire Center for Public Policy Inc: $20,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Marine Mammal Center: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Association of Zoo Veterinarians Co: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAdvocates for Snake Preservation: $13,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetWater for People: $11,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIndependence Institute: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Snow Leopard Trust: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMaui Humane Society: $8,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetProject Veritas: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $7,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSankara Eye Foundation USA: $5,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOcean Conservancy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the Preservation of Honeybees: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetNational Pediatric Cancer Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Waters Land Trust Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOcean Alliance Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRecreational Aviation Foundation: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLudwig Von Mises Institute for Austrian Economics Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBuck Institute for Research on Aging: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 31.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation with peer funders

About Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation

How much does Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation give?
Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation reported 26 grants totaling $230,500 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 21 and 25 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (59%), Animals (19%), Public Benefit (12%).
Who are Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Cato Institute ($199k), Amphibian Ark ($160k), Judicial Watch Inc ($70k).
Does Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 16% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jpmorgan Chase Foundation, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, Network for Good.
Where is Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation based?
Bernard & Nancy Karwick Foundation is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bernard & Nancy Karwick’s filings →

More from the funding graph