Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bentley Holden Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$398kArts & Culture$136kEnvironment$91kAnimals$72kFood & Nutrition$70kYouth Development$56kHuman Services$47kHealth$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,100
Median grant
15
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA GREENE HUMANE SO$8,500
SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS$7,600
HOLYOKE CC MUSIC DEPT$5,200
UNIV OF CHICAGO$5,100
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE$5,100
KIPP FOUNDATIONELIZABETH TIJERINA$4,400
WIKEMEDIA FOUNDATION INC$4,400
PALOUSE PRAIRIE CHARTER SCHOOL$4,300
FRIENDS OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY LIBRARY$4,200
SWC NEW EARTH INSTITUTE$4,200
STAND UP FOR YOUTH TUSCON$4,200
MARIST COLLEGE$4,100
SPECTRUM YOUTH CENT VT$3,300
CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM$3,300
CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE$3,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $4k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $3k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $3k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $3k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $3k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $3k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $3k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $3k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $3k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%DUTCHESS OUTREACH: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
NE
MD
AZ
NM
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 54 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

54 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
11

Total granted

$1.0M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+73%

Still filing today

39%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARIST UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +52%
  • OC
    OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +33%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNIV CHICAGO ALUMNI OFF
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • DC
    DUTCHESS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +73%
  • PG
    PROJECT GUTENBERG
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBIA GREENE HUMANE SO: $71,500 · OtherCOLUMBIA GREENE HUMANE SOPALOUSE PRAIRIE CHARTER SCHOOL: $32,800 · OtherHOLYOKE CC MUSIC DEPT: $31,400 · OtherPOUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT: $28,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $27,900 · OtherCARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM: $27,700 · OtherKIPP FOUNDATIONELIZABETH TIJERINA: $26,400 · OtherOUTSIDE IN YOUTH OF PDX: $25,600 · OtherNATIONAL COLLEGE OF MIDWIFERY: $25,600 · OtherCHARLOTTE LIBRARY: $24,400 · Other+40 more: $388,143 · Other+40 moreMARIST UNIVERSITY: $48,900 · EducationMARIST UNIVERSITYOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $36,800 · EducationOCCIDENTAL COLLEGECOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $35,900 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago: $29,712 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoSOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $23,400 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN COLLEGEPROJECT GUTENBERG LITERARY ARCHIVE FOUNDATION INC: $23,400 · EducationPROJECT GUTENBERG LITERARY…REED INSTITUTE: $16,032 · EducationREED INSTITUTEBARD COLLEGE: $14,700 · EducationBARD COLLEGE+3 more: $18,900 · Education+3 morePollinator Partnership: $18,800 · EnvironmentPALOUSE-CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE INC: $11,900 · EnvironmentThe Pachamama Alliance: $7,600 · EnvironmentDUTCHESS OUTREACH INC: $27,900 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $5,400 · Human ServicesCAMPHILL GHENT INC: $20,700 · Housing & ShelterInternational Rescue Committee INC: $16,800 · InternationalBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,200 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $3,500 · Health
Other$710,043Education$247,744Environment$38,300Human Services$33,300Housing & Shelter$20,700International$16,800Health$9,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY: $48,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $36,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $35,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $29,712 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPOUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT: $28,600 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetDUTCHESS OUTREACH INC: $27,900 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE OF MIDWIFERY: $25,600 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $23,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT GUTENBERG LITERARY ARCHIVE FOUNDATION INC: $23,400 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetCAMPHILL GHENT INC: $20,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPollinator Partnership: $18,800 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $16,800 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE: $16,032 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $14,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPALOUSE-CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE INC: $11,900 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $8,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pachamama Alliance: $7,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $7,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $5,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUTCHESS COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFENIMORE ART MUSEUM: $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $3,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOKING WITH KIDS INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds POUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds DUTCHESS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE OF MIDWIFERY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT GUTENBERG LITERARY ARCHIVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPHILL GHENT INC ↗
  • Who funds Pollinator Partnership ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PALOUSE-CLEARWATER ENVIRONMENTAL INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · James J McCann Charitable Trust · Plymouth Hill Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bentley Holden Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bentley Holden Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Reed Institute: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bentley Holden Fund?

Find your warmest path to Bentley Holden Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bentley Holden’s filings →

More from the funding graph