· Private foundation
Plymouth Hill Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $136k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| DANBURY HOSPITAL NEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| THE GEORGE WASHINGTON MASONIC NATIONAL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION INC | $15,000 |
| BANNERMAN CASTLE TRUST INC | $15,000 |
| NATL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA (WEBB-DEANE-STEVENS MUSEUM) | $10,500 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER DUTCHESS COUNTY | $10,000 |
| LUZERNE MUSIC CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| WEBB DEANE STEVENS MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF GREATER NEW YORK | $10,000 |
| MASONIC FOUNDATION OF DC | $10,000 |
| US PROFESSIONAL SQUASH ASSOC FOUNDATION | $8,500 |
| HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| DUTCHESS OUTREACH INC | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE GREAT SWAMP | $5,000 |
| HUDSONIA LIMITED | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
48 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $121k · revenue +35%
- LMLUZERNE MUSIC CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +114%
- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER HUDSON VALLEY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- RTRebuilding Together Houstonone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -67%
- SISTREETSQUASH INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +37%
- CCCORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDUCATIONone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…
Situated on the banks of the hudson river in yonkers, new york, the hudson river museum's mission is to engage, inspire, and connect diverse communities through the power of the arts, sciences, and history.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
The mission of the hudson river foundation is to inspire and inform action through science and engaging people to enhance the hudson river, estuary, and watershed (see schedule o).
The historic house trust of new york city (hht), in partnership with the new york city department of parks & recreation (nyc parks), advocates for, promotes, and provides expertise to preserve 23 publicly owned historic sites in new york…
To facilitate harvard university's scientific, literary, and educational activities in washington, dc.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Huguenot Historical Society New Paltz Ny and the most unlike its peers is Boscobel Restoration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds Vassar Brothers Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds LUZERNE MUSIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The Bannermans Castle Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds HUDSONIA LIMITED ↗
- Who funds Friends Of The Great Swamp Inc ↗
- Who funds KAATSBAAN INTERNATIONAL DANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GEORGE WASHINGTON MASONIC NATIONAL MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds DUTCHESS OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CONNECTIONS HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds BOSCOBEL RESTORATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
- Who funds US PROFESSIONAL SQUASH ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds POUGHKEEPSIE FARM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Hudson Valley Hospice Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COVER HOME REPAIR INC ↗
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds Rebuilding Together Houston ↗
- Who funds BEATRIX FARRAND GARDEN ASSOC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Ibm International Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family Charitable Foundation · James J McCann Charitable Trust · United Way of the Dutchess-Orange Region Inc · Field Hall Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Plymouth Hill Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cover Home Repair Inc — 3% of income from government
- Vermont Institute of Natural Science Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Plymouth Hill Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Plymouth Hill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.