Skip to content

· Private foundation

Benson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$725k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.4MInternational$972kHousing & Shelter$535kHealth$506kRecreation & Sports$321kEducation$281kCivil Rights$255kHuman Services$243kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $415k
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES$150,000
Individual grant recipient$115,000
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES$100,000
METRO DENVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$40,000
NATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA$35,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHENS$30,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE$30,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO COLLEGE MATCH$30,000
CO OUTDOOR ED CENTER$25,000
EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH$25,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$15,000
BLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANTIY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 7%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $28k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 7%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $25k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 7%DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 7%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $20k → 7%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $20k → 7%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $20k → 7%EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $12k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 20 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$5.4M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+57%

Still filing today

65%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    Western Resource Advocates
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +114%
  • ID
    INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $465k · revenue +79%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $295k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - PUERTO RICO RELIEF
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • SI
    StriveTogether Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +196%
  • TC
    The Colorado Trail Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
2
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
5
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
8
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
9
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
10
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
11
Western Conservation Foundation

Building leaders to protect the west's land, air, and water.

Environment
12
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Repertory Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $585,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMETRO DENVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $370,000 · OtherMETRO DENVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITYCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO COLLEGE MATCH: $275,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS FBO COLLEGE MATCHAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $255,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEEMT EVANS HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE: $211,000 · OtherMT EVANS HOME HEALTH & HOSPICENATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC: $211,000 · OtherNATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INCCO OUTDOOR ED CENTER: $156,000 · OtherCO OUTDOOR ED CENTERBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $135,000 · OtherBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY+4 more: $85,000 · OtherWestern Resource Advocates: $1,385,000 · Crime & LegalWestern Resource AdvocatesINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES: $465,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL DEVELO…ASHOKA: $255,000 · InternationalASHOKATHE CARTER CENTER INC: $152,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER IN…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHE…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $295,000 · HealthEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $125,000 · Human ServicesDENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $118,000 · Human ServicesBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $150,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Colorado Trail Foundation: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL: $86,000 · Food & NutritionStriveTogether Inc: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,283,000Crime & Legal$1,385,000International$972,000Health$295,000Human Services$243,000Recreation & Sports$165,000Food & Nutrition$86,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWestern Resource Advocates: $1,385,000 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES: $465,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $295,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetASHOKA: $255,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC: $211,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $152,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $150,000 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetBLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $135,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetEVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH: $125,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetDENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $118,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL: $86,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetStriveTogether Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClatsop Community Action: $24,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Colorado Trail Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Western Resource Advocates ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ENTERPRISES ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHOKA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SPRUCE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds DENVER INDIAN FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds StriveTogether Inc ↗
  • Who funds Clatsop Community Action ↗
  • Who funds The Colorado Trail Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Western Union Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Clatsop Community Action: 26% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Benson Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Benson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Benson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph