Skip to content

· Private foundation

Benjamin & Bettina Van Cleave Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$42kEducation$35kReligion$13kHuman Services$6kYouth Development$4kEnvironment$1kCivil Rights$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$139k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Logan Square Improv$5,000
Chicago Youth Symphony Orchestras$3,000
Misericordia$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
WFMT 987WTTW$3,000
Alternatives Inc$2,000
Chicago International Puppet Theatre Festival$1,500
Josephinum Academy$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOWARD AREA COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 14%Howard Area Community Center: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 16 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$128k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
-34%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LOGAN SQUARE IMPROV
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +43%
  • CY
    CHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +74%
  • CI
    Chicago International Puppet Theater Festival
    4× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +171%

Funded once

  • HE
    Howard & Evanston Community Center
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • CC
    CURTAIN CALL COMMUNITY THEATER
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • EN
    ECOVIVA NFP
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber Opera of Chicago
—
2
Chicago City Theatre Company dba Joel Hall Dancers & Center

To enrich the lives of our community through dance education and performance while developing Chicago's native talent pool in a welcoming environment that celebrates multiculturalism & ethnic diversity.

Arts & Culture
3
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Jazz Philharmonic

To present high quality arts programming and musical performances that will educate, enrich and improve the quality of life for the diverse Chicago cultural communities and beyond.

—
5
Theatre Y

Create connections between diverse artists seeking mutual growth through collaboration.

Arts & Culture
6
Chicago Sinfonietta Inc

Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…

Arts & Culture
7
Constellation Performing Arts

Constellation is a performing arts presenter with an emphasis on forward- thinking practices, particularly in the areas of jazz, improvised, experimental, and contemporary classical music.

Arts & Culture
8
Teatro Vista Theater With a View Inc

Teatro Vista Productions is a non-profit theatre-based company dedicated to multidisciplinary artists of color whose artistic expression on stage and beyond is rooted in the transformative power of owning and telling our own stories.

Arts & Culture
9
Pegasus Theatre Chicago

Pegasus Theatre Chicago is a professional theater approaching 45 years of supporting Chicagos diverse community by producing accessible, socially relevant theatre and promoting the development of new artists for the stage. Our mission is…

—
10
Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra

Illinois Philharmonic Orchestra's mission as a professional orchestra is to utilize the universal expression of music to create profound, inspiring, and personal connections between the people and communities of Chicagos Southland.

Arts & Culture
11
Classical Music Chicago

Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.

Arts & Culture
12
Chicago Kids Company

THE ORGANIZATION enriches the lives of the young Chicago of children with their classic fairy tale productions. The ORGANIZATION colorful shows introduce children ages 2 to 10 to the magic of live theater, and inspire children to laugh,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundations of Music; the most unlike its peers is Ecoviva Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOSEPHINUM ACADEMY: $18,000 · OtherJOSEPHINUM ACADEMYREGINA DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOL: $16,500 · OtherREGINA DOMINICAN HIGH SCHOOLMisericordia: $12,500 · OtherMisericordiaWFMT 987WTTW: $8,500 · OtherWFMT 987WTTWIndividual grant recipient: $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · Other+6 more: $9,000 · Other+6 moreLOGAN SQUARE IMPROV: $13,000 · Arts & CultureLOGAN SQUARE IMPROVCHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY …Chicago International Puppet Theater Festival: $4,500 · Arts & CultureChicago International P…CURTAIN CALL COMMUNITY THEATRE: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCURTAIN CALL COMMUNITY …Albany Park Theater Project: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentALTERNATIVES INC: $3,500 · HealthHoward Area Community Center: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHANGING WORLDS: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$95,000Arts & Culture$28,000Youth Development$3,500Health$3,500Human Services$2,000Civil Rights$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOGAN SQUARE IMPROV: $13,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChicago International Puppet Theater Festival: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAlbany Park Theater Project: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALTERNATIVES INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCURTAIN CALL COMMUNITY THEATRE: $2,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetST JOSEPH SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHoward Area Community Center: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECOVIVA NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHANGING WORLDS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOGAN SQUARE IMPROV ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS ↗
  • Who funds Chicago International Puppet Theater Festival ↗
  • Who funds Albany Park Theater Project ↗
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds CURTAIN CALL COMMUNITY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Howard Area Community Center ↗
  • Who funds ECOVIVA NFP ↗
  • Who funds CHANGING WORLDS ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS OF MUSIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Mary V Duffy Charitable Foundation · Prince Foundation · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · WP & HB White Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benjamin & Bettina Van Cleave Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benjamin & Bettina Van Cleave Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Benjamin & Bettina Van Cleave Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Benjamin & Bettina Van Cleave Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benjamin & Bettina Van Cleave’s filings →

    More from the funding graph