Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ben G Barnett Fnd Trust Xxxxx5005

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$244kEducation$178kHealth$178kHuman Services$123kReligion$116kCommunity Improvement$57kYouth Development$33kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
$3,449
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS$28,734
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$14,383
CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL$11,503
SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN$11,503
DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED$11,503
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$5,760
HADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER$5,760
JERRY M LEWIS MD MENTAL HEALTH$5,760
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$5,760
UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS$5,760
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$5,760
SALESMANSHIP CLUB$5,760
CITY OF HOPE GUILD CO$5,760
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$3,449
THE SALVATION ARMY TX DIV HQ$3,449
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY OF HOPE GUILD CO: $6k → 14%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $12k → 5%THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND: $6k → 14%NATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR COMMUNITY: $6k → 11%CITY OF HOPE GUILD CO: $5k → 14%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%ROMAN CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR: $5k → 14%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $7k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $5k → 5%SALESMANSHIP CLUB: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS: $9k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS: $6k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $29k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $25k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $25k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $24k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $24k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF: $17k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF: $13k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF: $12k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 14%JERRY M LEWIS MD MENTAL HEALTH: $6k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $12k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $7k → 14%HADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER: $6k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $5k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $7k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $5k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MA
CT
CA
CO
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$803k · 32 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
1

Total granted

$803k
$1k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $79k · revenue +33%
  • UO
    University of Dallas
    8× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +5%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2022 · $37k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • TU
    The University of Texas System
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
2
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
3
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
4
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Dallas Regional Chamber

Together, with our business leaders and community partners, we will help lead the dallas region to become the best place in the united states for all people to live, work, and do business.

—
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salesmanship Club of Dallas; the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $68,040 · OtherDALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGEDCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND: $68,040 · OtherCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDJEWISH FEDERATION OF: $42,569 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OFCITY OF HOPE GUILD CO: $34,068 · OtherCITY OF HOPE GUILD COHADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER: $34,068 · OtherHADASSAH MEDICAL CENTERSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $33,676 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDRENROMAN CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR: $23,294 · OtherTIMBERLAWN FOUNDATION INC: $23,294 · OtherNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR COMMUNITY: $22,872 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $17,033 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $17,033 · Other+13 more: $125,482 · Other+13 moreDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $78,973 · EducationDALLAS BAPTIST UNI…University of Dallas: $40,168 · EducationUniversity of Dall…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $34,068 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $127,390 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION…UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $17,033 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MET…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $36,798 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $6,452 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,880 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $34,068 · Recreation & SportsMomentous Institute: $23,294 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $10,256 · Youth DevelopmentSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $10,774 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,202 · Civil Rights
Other$509,469Education$153,209Philanthropy$144,423Health$46,130Recreation & Sports$34,068Youth Development$33,550Community Improvement$10,774Civil Rights$10,202

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $127,390 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $78,973 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas: $40,168 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $36,798 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS: $34,068 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $34,068 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMomentous Institute: $23,294 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $17,033 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas: $10,774 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $10,256 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,202 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,202 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $6,452 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ben G Barnett Fnd Trust Xxxxx5005 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ben G Barnett Fnd Trust Xxxxx5005. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ben G Barnett Fnd Trust Xxxxx5005’s filings →

    More from the funding graph