Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ben G Barnett Fnd Trust Xxxxx5005

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$244kEducation$178kHealth$178kHuman Services$123kReligion$116kCommunity Improvement$57kYouth Development$33kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
$3,449
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS$28,734
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$14,383
DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED$11,503
SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN$11,503
CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL$11,503
THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION$5,760
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$5,760
SALESMANSHIP CLUB$5,760
CITY OF HOPE GUILD CO$5,760
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$5,760
UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS$5,760
HADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER$5,760
JERRY M LEWIS MD MENTAL HEALTH$5,760
THE WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS TRAINING$3,449
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$3,449
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY OF HOPE GUILD CO: $6k → 14%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $12k → 5%THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND: $6k → 14%NATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR COMMUNITY: $6k → 11%CITY OF HOPE GUILD CO: $5k → 14%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%ROMAN CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR: $5k → 14%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $10k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $7k → 5%DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $5k → 5%SALESMANSHIP CLUB: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS: $9k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS: $6k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $29k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $25k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $25k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $24k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $24k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF: $17k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF: $13k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF: $12k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 14%JERRY M LEWIS MD MENTAL HEALTH: $6k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $12k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $7k → 14%HADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER: $6k → 14%CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $5k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $12k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $14k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $7k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL: $5k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $9k → 14%DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MA
CT
CA
CO
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$803k · 32 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
1

Total granted

$803k
$1k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DB
    DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $79k · revenue +33%
  • UO
    University of Dallas
    8× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +5%
  • TS
    TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2022 · $37k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TU
    The University of Texas System
    one grant, 2018 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

2
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
3
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
4
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Dallas Regional Chamber

Together, with our business leaders and community partners, we will help lead the dallas region to become the best place in the united states for all people to live, work, and do business.

7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salesmanship Club of Dallas and the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED — $68,040 · OtherDALLAS HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGEDCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND — $68,040 · OtherCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDJEWISH FEDERATION OF — $42,569 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OFCITY OF HOPE GUILD CO — $34,068 · OtherCITY OF HOPE GUILD COHADASSAH MEDICAL CENTER — $34,068 · OtherHADASSAH MEDICAL CENTERSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN — $33,676 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDRENTIMBERLAWN FOUNDATION INC — $23,294 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR — $23,294 · OtherNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR COMMUNITY — $22,872 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND — $17,033 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $17,033 · Other+13 more — $125,482 · Other+13 moreDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $78,973 · EducationDALLAS BAPTIST UNI…University of Dallas — $40,168 · EducationUniversity of Dall…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $34,068 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLE…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS — $127,390 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION…UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $17,033 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MET…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $36,798 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $6,452 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $2,880 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS — $34,068 · Recreation & SportsMomentous Institute — $23,294 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $10,256 · Youth DevelopmentSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $10,774 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $10,202 · Civil Rights
Other$509,469Education$153,209Philanthropy$144,423Health$46,130Recreation & Sports$34,068Youth Development$33,550Community Improvement$10,774Civil Rights$10,202

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS — $127,390 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $78,973 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas — $40,168 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $36,798 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS — $34,068 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $34,068 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMomentous Institute — $23,294 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $17,033 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $10,774 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $10,256 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $10,202 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $10,202 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $6,452 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Dallas
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF DALLAS
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
  • Who funds Momentous Institute
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ben G Barnett Fnd Trust Xxxxx5005 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph