Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hoeffner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$328k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$725kEducation$155kHuman Services$145kFood & Nutrition$90kHealth$69kCommunity Improvement$55kArts & Culture$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 41 grants below total $308,150 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $328,150 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k37 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$1,350
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESU FOUNDATION$200,000
MARYWOOD COLLEGE$20,000
PATH$10,000
EAST TEXAS REGIONAL FOOD BANK$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER$5,000
UNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY$5,000
MEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY, INC.$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
HOPE HAVEN OF EAST TEXAS$4,000
LITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER$2,500
ST. MATTHEWS HOUSE$2,500
HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK$2,500
ST. GEORGE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SMITH COUNTY$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 41 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
8

Total granted

$1.8M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+48%

Still filing today

51%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP
    6× · 2019–2024 · $55k · revenue +41%
  • ET
    EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +85%
  • TI
    TAPKARD INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • CA
    CALDWELL ARTS ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +33%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EAST TEXAS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

2
Tyler Economic Development Council Inc

Support economic development of greater tyler area.

Community Improvement
3
Texas Pharmacy Association

The association's purpose is to promote the role of the pharmacist and the practice of pharmacy in the state of texas.

4
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

5
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Health Center of Southeast Texas

Our mission is to provide accessible, compassionate, culturally competent, and quality health care, affordable for all, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
8
United Ways of Texas Inc

United ways of texas (uwt) exists to strengthen and support the work and impact of local united ways in texas.

Philanthropy
9
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
10
Texas Alliance for Patient Access

Preserve access to quality healthcare for all texans

Community Improvement
11
Texas Health Care Association

To unite, represent, and support professionals who strive to improve the delivery, quality, and integrity of long term healthcare services.

12
United Way of East-Central Texas

To support local united way agencies to provide needed services to community members.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Texas Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Construc…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development CentersCommunity Hospital SystemsChristian Youth CampsFood Pantries and AssistanceYouth Sports ProgramsUnited Way AffiliatesCollege Foundation SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Hospice and Palliative CarePublic School District Foun…Local History MuseumsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Literacy TutoringSenior Support ServicesVeteran Support ServicesDomestic Violence and Sexua…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr15%35%35–55yr17%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr15%55%35–55yr17%15%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 7% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
2/29
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,133

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ESU FOUNDATION — $1,186,000 · OtherESU FOUNDATIONMARYWOOD COLLEGE — $120,000 · OtherMARYWOOD COLLEGEEAST TEXAS REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $55,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $54,000 · Other+33 more — $181,400 · Other+33 morePATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP — $55,000 · Human ServicesEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesWings of Hope Equitherapy — $9,600 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC — $27,000 · Food & NutritionHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $7,500 · Food & NutritionLITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS — $12,500 · EducationTEXAS COLLEGE — $6,000 · EducationTYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Education+1 more — $500 · EducationTAPKARD INC — $16,000 · Crime & LegalST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterEAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL CAMP V — $12,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,596,400Human Services$100,600Food & Nutrition$34,500Education$25,000Crime & Legal$16,000Housing & Shelter$13,500Public Benefit$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP — $55,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC — $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTAPKARD INC — $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS — $12,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL CAMP V — $12,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY — $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF NORTHEAST TEXAS dba ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF SMITH COUNTY — $11,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWings of Hope Equitherapy — $9,600 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC — $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS COLLEGE — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Symphony League of Tyler Inc — $6,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTYLER MUSEUM OF ART — $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH CLINIC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds TAPKARD INC
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF TYLER DBA PAVE EAST TEXAS
  • Who funds EAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL CAMP V
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SMITH COUNTY
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF NORTHEAST TEXAS dba ALZHEIMERS ALLIANCE OF SMITH COUNTY
  • Who funds Wings of Hope Equitherapy
  • Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds TEXAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds Womens Symphony League of Tyler Inc
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Smith County
  • Who funds TYLER MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF EAST TEXAS
  • Who funds TYLER IND SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COLLIER COUNTY FLOR

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ben and Maytee Fisch FoundationTX32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ben and Maytee Fisch Foundation · East Texas Communities Foundation · Hibbs Family Foundation · The Rogers Foundation · The Junior League of Tyler Inc · Byers Family Foundation · Riter Family Foundation · Bob L Herd Foundation · The Louis and Peaches Owen Family Foundation · James I Perkins Family Foundation · Womens Fund of Smith County · A S Genecov Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $440k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph