Skip to content
Bell-Wallace Charitable Trust Xxxxx3002 at a glance

· Private foundation

Bell-Wallace Charitable Trust Xxxxx3002

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$259kFood & Nutrition$37kHuman Services$35kReligion$30kArts & Culture$15k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$638k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALING SHEPHERD CLINIC$10,000
W I COOK FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE ALL SAINTS$10,000
TARRANT COUNTY ACADEMY OFMEDICINE$5,500
NORTHSIDE INTER CHURCH AGENCY INC$5,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $5k → 11%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR: $5k → 11%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR: $5k → 11%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR: $5k → 11%TARRANT COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR: $5k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $5k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSITANCE NETWORK: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 9 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$357k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+40%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Child Study Center
    7× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +43%
  • AS
    All Saints Health Foundation
    6× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +49%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    8× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +40%
  • ST
    Shine Therapy Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
2
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
5
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
6
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
7
Scott & White Hospital-Taylor

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
8
Cook Children's Home Health

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
9
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
10
Cancer Care Services

Cancer care services supports cancer patients, cares for caregivers, and empowers survivors to reduce the impact of cancer in tarrant county.

Health
11
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
12
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healing Shepherd Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Shine Therapy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Healing Shepherd Clinic: $110,000 · HealthHealing Shepherd ClinicAll Saints Health Foundation: $50,000 · HealthAll Saints Health FoundationWI Cook Foundation Inc: $20,000 · HealthWI Cook Foundation IncTHE ART STATION: $15,000 · HealthTHE ART STATIONChild Study Center: $70,000 · EducationChild Study CenterTARRANT COUNTY ACADEMY OF MEDICINE: $5,500 · EducationTARRANT COUNTY ACADEMY…Tarrant Area Food Bank: $37,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food Ban…BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE ALL SAINTS: $25,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE …NORTHSIDE INTER CHURCH AGENCY INC: $5,000 · OtherNORTHSIDE INTER CHURC…Shine Therapy Inc: $3,000 · OtherTarrant County Association For the Blind: $20,000 · Human ServicesTarrant Co…CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTON…COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …
Health$195,000Education$75,500Other$70,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHealing Shepherd Clinic: $110,000 over 9y, 4.5% of budgetChild Study Center: $70,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAll Saints Health Foundation: $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $37,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant County Association For the Blind: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART STATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Thomas M Helen McKee …America's CharitiesCommunities Foundatio…The C B Baird Jr Foun…Fort Worth Colonial C…Crystelle Waggoner Ch…Helen Irwin Littauer …The Alcon Foundation …Amon G Carter Foundat…Sid W Richardson Foun…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · America's Charities · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The C B Baird Jr Foundation · Fort Worth Colonial Charities Inc (Fka Bfc Colonial Inc) · Crystelle Waggoner Charitable Trust · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · The Alcon Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bell-Wallace Charitable Trust Xxxxx3002 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bell-Wallace Charitable Trust Xxxxx3002. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bell-Wallace Charitable Trust Xxxxx3002’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home