Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Bedrock Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
16
Organizations funded FY2022
31%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Bedrock Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Bedrock Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $42k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’17
16
’18
14
’19
8
’20
6
’21
10
’22
4
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2022
$4,250
Organizations funded a year
11 to 26
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
9
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 31% of the organizations Bedrock Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 18% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202216$36k31%
FY202111$31k9%
FY202017$65k47%
FY201926$79k31%
FY201821$69k62%
FY201721$62kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$1.0MEducation$209kHealth$26kYouth Development$19kScience & Tech$18kHuman Services$14kReligion$11kCivil Rights$7kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
WI
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MD
DC
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 31 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 25 recipients with no EIN on record ($144k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Bedrock Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $36,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmherst College Trustees: $32,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe United Way of Central Maryland Inc: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHockaday School: $19,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWatson Institute: $18,007 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Colorado College: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJohns Hopkins University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Episcopal School of Dallas Inc: $9,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFriends for Life: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHigh Mountain Institute Inc: $5,920 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNational Multiple Sclerosis Society: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ingenuity Project Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEducate: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStrong City Baltimore Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget29th Street Community Center Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJohn Austin Cheley Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGeological Society of America Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBreakthrough Houston: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLaw Enforcement Action Partnership Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaryland New Directions Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKaty Christian Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanopy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter Stage Associates Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThread Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChild Advocates Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 27.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Abell Foundation IncMD15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Abell Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Bedrock Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bedrock Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bedrock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Bedrock Foundation

How much does Bedrock Foundation give?
Bedrock Foundation reported 18 grants totaling $42,250 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 26 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Bedrock Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Philanthropy (77%), Education (15%), Health (2%).
Who are Bedrock Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: United Way of Greater Houston ($36k), Amherst College Trustees ($32k), The United Way of Central Maryland Inc ($25k).
Does Bedrock Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 31% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Bedrock Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Bedrock Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Abell Foundation Inc, The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc, The Chicago Community Trust.
Where is Bedrock Foundation based?
Bedrock Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bedrock’s filings →

More from the funding graph