Skip to content

· Private foundation

Becker Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$256k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$521kHealth$59kRecreation & Sports$38kReligion$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kAnimals$6kPhilanthropy$4kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $206k
$1,900
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS ENDOWMENT$205,750
EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,500
ALZEHEIMER'S ASSOC OF COLORADO$10,000
CORPUS CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIAT$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$4,000
ANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH$3,500
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$1,900
CITY OF STEAMBOAT SPRINGS COLORADO$1,200
BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENT$1,000
STEAMBOAT YOUTH HOCKEY$800
ALZHEIMERS SOCIETY$750
HUMANE SOCIETY OF STEAMBOAT$400
STEAMBOAT CHRISTIAN CENTER$400
YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $600 → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%SELAH: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IN
CA
CO
AZ
NM
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 27 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +74% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
33

Total granted

$609k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+74%

Still filing today

37%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionAnimalsInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Association
    9× · 2017–2025 · $422k · revenue +93%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +3%
  • BO
    Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • WE
    WILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • PD
    PHI DELTA THETA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • LF
    LOVEPUP FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
Pueblo Rescue Mission

Because of our love for God, we extend his mercy as we strive to empower and improve the lives of unsheltered adults in Pueblo, CO, through provisions of food, shelter and navigational support services.

—
3
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
4
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
5
Colorado State Fire Chiefs

The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
7
Colorado Animal Rescue Inc

C.A.R.E's mission is practicing excellence in the animal care, education, and advocacy to connect pets to their people.

Animals
8
Colorado Nonprofit Association

Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.

Community Improvement
9
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
10
Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc

The adaptive sports center enriches the lives of people with disabilities and other specific needs through exceptional outdoor adventures. the successful programs the asc provides are inclusive to families and friends, empower our…

—
11
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
12
Yampatika

Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
26/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Kansas University Endowment Association: $422,363 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment AssociationEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $39,500 · EducationEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+4 more: $15,250 · EducationLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIAT: $35,000 · OtherLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSO…MAYO CLINIC: $22,500 · OtherMAYO CLINICALZEHEIMER'S ASSOC OF COLORADO: $22,000 · OtherALZEHEIMER'S ASSOC OF COLORADOCORPUS CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherCORPUS CHRISTI CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH: $19,500 · OtherANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCHWILLIAMS EDUCATIONAL FUND: $8,000 · Other+37 more: $46,460 · Other+37 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $600 · Human Services+2 more: $150 · Human ServicesBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $200 · Recreation & SportsYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,900 · PhilanthropyCOURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $1,050 · PhilanthropyLOVEPUP FOUNDATION: $2,000 · AnimalsArizona Humane Society: $1,320 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $500 · AnimalsCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $1,500 · ReligionINTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA: $1,000 · Religion+1 more: $50 · Religion
Education$477,113Other$193,460Human Services$8,750Recreation & Sports$6,200Philanthropy$4,950Animals$3,820Religion$2,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $422,363 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $39,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $13,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSKYLINE SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $5,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOVEPUP FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPaz De Cristo Community Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $1,320 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetK-LOVE & AIR1 FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $1,050 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRoutt County Humane Society: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPI KAPPA PHI FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSelah: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND FUTURES PREVENTION COALITION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗
  • Who funds EMPORIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
  • Who funds SKYLINE SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOVEPUP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Paz De Cristo Community Center ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds K-LOVE & AIR1 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation · United Way of the Yampa Valley · Anschutz Family Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Shell USA Company Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Becker Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Becker Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Becker’s filings →

More from the funding graph