Skip to content
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

$4.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$16MHuman Services$80kHousing & Shelter$49kEducation$30k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $64k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.6M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$535M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Baylor University Medical Center$4,573,457
Mckinney Education Foundation$24,039
Common Good Medical$10,000
Lifepath Systems$10,000
American Heart Association$10,000
Community Health Clinic$10,000
ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship$9,400
The Samaritan Inn$6,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $9k → 5%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $10k → 5%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $10k → 5%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $10k → 5%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $9k → 5%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $9k → 5%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $9k → 5%ManeGait Therapeutic Horsemanship: $9k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 6 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against -41% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$12M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
-41%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    Baylor University Medical Center
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12M · revenue +73%
  • TN
    THE NORTH TEXAS FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $150k · revenue +34%
  • MG
    Mane Gait
    8× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +210%

Funded once

  • DC
    Dallas County Indigent Care
    one grant, 2018 · $3.4M · revenue -100%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -19%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
2
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
3
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
4
Baylor All Saints Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
5
Baylor Health Care System Foundation

To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…

Health
6
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
7
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
8
Baylor Medical Center at Irving

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
10
Baylor Medical Center at Waxahachie

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
11
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Baylor Health Care System

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas County Indigent Care; the most unlike its peers is Children & Community Health Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Baylor University Medical Center: $11,937,380 · HealthBaylor University Medical CenterDallas County Indigent Care: $3,412,039 · HealthDallas County Indigent Care+5 more: $67,000 · HealthTHE NORTH TEXAS FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN & COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $60,000 · OtherSAMARITAN INN INC: $49,207 · OtherCOLLIN COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH RETARDATION CENTER: $10,000 · OtherGARLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherMane Gait: $74,000 · Human ServicesMCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $24,039 · EducationOne Heart McKinney: $5,500 · Community Improvement
Health$15,416,419Philanthropy$150,000Other$124,707Human Services$74,000Education$24,039Community Improvement$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor University Medical Center: $11,937,380 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDallas County Indigent Care: $3,412,039 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetTHE NORTH TEXAS FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMane Gait: $74,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN & COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $60,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSAMARITAN INN INC: $49,207 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLIFEPATH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetMCKINNEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $24,039 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARLAND ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOne Heart McKinney: $5,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Texas Instruments Fou…Coserv Charitable Fou…Prism FoundationSrs Raise the Roof Fo…United Way of Metropo…The Blackbaud Giving …National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Prism Foundation · Srs Raise the Roof Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home