Skip to content

· Public charity

Bauer Family Resources Inc

Empower children and their families to thrive.

$229k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$190kHealth$135kHuman Services$126kHousing & Shelter$95kYouth Development$67kEnvironment$50kEducation$36kPhilanthropy$29kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $120,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $229,258 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $109,258 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEDOM MISSION$50,000
LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC$20,000
EVANGELICAL COVENANT CHURCH$20,000
HOPE SPRINGS$15,000
HEALTHY COMM CLINTON COUNTY$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FREEDOM MISSION: $50k → 10%FREEDOM MISSION: $30k → 10%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $46k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of Bauer Family Resources Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 79%.

Bauer Family Resources Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$576k · 8 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$576k
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-26%

Still filing today

75%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $175k · revenue +65%
  • HC
    HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN
    5× · 2017–2023 · $98k · revenue +119%
  • HS
    HOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $90k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • DE
    DUKE ENERGY HELPING HANDS
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE
    one grant, 2020 · $46k · revenue -26%
  • CS
    COMMUNITY SCHOOLS OF FRANKFORT
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Worthy Women Recovery Home Inc

To reduce recidivism rate in female offenders in laporte county.

Health
2
In His Wings Ministry

Safe place for women overcoming addiction and incarceration.

Human Services
3
Family Life Center Inc

Counseling and treating drug and alcohol abuse clients.

Health
4
The Giving Store

Our mission as a thrift store is to provide quality merchandise at thrift store prices, while serving the community and anyone that enjoys a bargaqin. all proceeds from the giving store go to benefit s.a.f.e. house and towards ending…

Human Services
5
Hope House Corporation

To provide drug rehabilitation.

—
6
Fayette Resale Incorporated

The organization helps to support local needy people by providing clothing and household items at a reduced or no cost, excess revenue is distributed to local charities.

Human Services
7
New Life Ministries Indiana Inc

To serve those in need of food, shelter, and a purpose-filled life.

Food & Nutrition
8
Lydias Place Womens and Family Shelter of Randolph

Serves women, children, and families experiencing homelessness in central nc by providing a safe, comfortable & supportive environment for temporary housing to break the cycle of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
9
Joelton Hope Center

Joelton hope center operates as a thrift store that supports a food pantry.

Human Services
10
Dearborn County Clearing House for Emergency Aid Inc

To provide assistance to the needy in southearstern indiana in the form of food housing and utilities.

Human Services
11
Ywca North Central Indiana Inc

The ywca strengthens our community against violence and aggression. we provide immediate safety, lasting stability, independence, empowerment, and transformation for all. we are a source of hope.

—
12
Faith Home Restoration Inc

Provide a safe home for women in a faith-based program and restoring them back to the community with deployable life skills.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Springs Safe House Incorporate; the most unlike its peers is Lafayette Parks Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $174,977 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INCDUKE ENERGY HELPING HANDS: $50,000 · OtherDUKE ENERGY HELPING HAND…GRACE RECOVERY CORP: $41,658 · OtherGRACE RECOVERY CORPCOVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LAFAYETTE INDIANA: $20,000 · OtherCOVENANT COMMUNITY DEVEL…COMMUNITY SCHOOLS OF FRANKFORT: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SCHOOLS OF FRA…LAFAYETTE SCHOOL CORPORATION: $10,000 · OtherLAFAYETTE SCHOOL CORPORA…TIPPECANOE SCHOOL CORPORATION: $10,000 · OtherTIPPECANOE SCHOOL CORPOR…FAITH BIBLICAL COUNSELING MINISTRIE: $8,000 · OtherDelphi United Methodist Church: $6,500 · OtherATTICA CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION: $6,144 · OtherFREEDOM MISSION INC: $79,999 · Human ServicesFREEDOM MISSION IN…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $45,758 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRIS…HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN: $98,223 · HealthHEALTHY COMMUNITI…SURF CENTER INCORPORATED: $22,000 · HealthSURF CENTER INCOR…HOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE: $89,684 · Housing & ShelterHOPE SPRINGS …TRINITY HORIZONS INC: $29,173 · PhilanthropyLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $40,223 · Youth Development
Food & Nutrition$174,977Other$162,302Human Services$125,757Health$120,223Housing & Shelter$89,684Philanthropy$49,173Youth Development$40,223

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC: $174,977 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN: $98,223 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetHOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE: $89,684 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $45,758 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY: $40,223 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTRINITY HORIZONS INC: $29,173 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSURF CENTER INCORPORATED: $22,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE ↗
  • Who funds LYN TREECE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TIPPECANOE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SURF CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Indiana University Health Arnett IncIN20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Indiana University Health Arnett Inc · North Central Health Services Inc · United Way of Greater Lafayette · Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundation · Greater Lafayette Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The McAllister Foundation · Northwest Central Indiana Community Partnerships Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bauer Family Resources Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bauer Family Resources Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $81k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bauer Family Resources’ filings →

    More from the funding graph