· Public charity
Bartlesville Regional United Way In
Leading the fight to improve the health, education and financial stability of every person in our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE | $186,285 |
| BUILDING BRIDGES OF OKLAHOMA | $160,000 |
| FAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC | $142,000 |
| SAMARITAN COUNSELING & GROWTH CTR | $135,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIESMARY MARTHA OUTR | $130,000 |
| ELDER CARE | $120,000 |
| CHEROKEE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS | $112,190 |
| Individual grant recipient | $110,000 |
| AGAPE MISSION | $95,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $90,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA | $80,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA | $73,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $40,000 |
| THE COTTAGE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $223k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBoys & Girls Club of Bartlesville7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M
- ECElder Care8× · 2017–2024 · $972k
- FHFAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC6× · 2019–2024 · $779k
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLEgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $186k · revenue +128%
- BBBuilding Bridgesone grant, 2022 · $172k
- SCSamartian Counseling and Growth Centerone grant, 2022 · $121k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as responsible, caring, and productive citizens.
Boys and girls club of chelsea inc is an oklahoma nonprofit corporation whose purpose is to provide educational, personal development for the general public to prevent child abuse.
To enable all young people, especially those who need them most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive and caring citizens.
The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.
The mission of the boys & girls clubs of west central missouri is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as caring and productive citizens.
To inspire and enable young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens in the southeast idaho area.
The arbuckle area council boys scouts of america is a local council for southern oklahoma. the purpose of the council and scouting is to build and develop characterand high moral values of boys.
To inspire, educate, and empower all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, resposnsible and caring citizens, in a safe environment
To provide gymnastics training to the youth of bartlesville, ok and the surrounding area, teaching discipline, character and physical fitness.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
To provide behavioral guidance and to promote health, social education, vocational, and character development of youth in leflore county, oklahoma.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Bartlesville and the most unlike its peers is Mary Martha Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Mary Martha Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FAMILY YMCA OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
- Who funds THE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA ↗
- Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lyon Foundation · McAnaw Family Foundation · Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Kenneth G and Diana Moon Adams Foundation · K S Adams Foundation Co-Trust · Bartlesville Community Foundation · Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bartlesville Regional United Way In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Youth and Family Services Inc — 23% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.