· Private foundation
Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $199k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $609k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRANK PHILLIPS FOUNDATION | $142,860 |
| OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| B THE LIGHT MISSION FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| CITY COMPASSION | $66,188 |
| BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH | $60,000 |
| RICHARD KANE YMCA OF BARTLESVILLE | $50,000 |
| OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE | $46,328 |
| Individual grant recipient | $45,000 |
| AGAPE MISSION | $38,300 |
| DEWEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $24,336 |
| BARTLESVILLE EDUCATION PROMISE | $10,000 |
| K-LIFE OF BARTLESVILLE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 95% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OWOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY3× · 2021–2025 · $433k · revenue +13%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE5× · 2020–2024 · $332k · revenue +38%
- FOFRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- OTON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +12%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATAone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -62%
- HIHEARTMATTERS INCone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide gymnastics training to the youth of bartlesville, ok and the surrounding area, teaching discipline, character and physical fitness.
Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.
Operate a volunteer community center for disadvantage individuals in tulsa, oklahoma.
The Good OKC was created to equip and empower the people of OKC to experience the Kingdom of God in the everyday lives. Far too often we seperate our spiritual lives from our actual life. We believe following Jesus is a 24/7 endeavor and…
The western oklahoma family care center show's god's love by helping families in western oklahoma overcome barrier in their lives in order to help them become contributinng self-supporting citizens
The mission of the walworth county care center is to provide access to long-term care services in a high quality, compassionate, and dignified manner to residents in walworth county.
The Freedom Center of OKC, LLC endeavors to educate, empower and enlighten our nation to reflect on the past, present, and future of the Civil Rights Movement in Oklahoma, and to develop facilities and programs to effect the mission of the…
To prevent homelessness and increase self-sufficiency for all people. the center provides educaton and resource assistance in a culturally sensitive, encouraging, and christ-centered environment.
A non-profit organization providing transportation, socialization, congregate and/or home delivered meals to senior citizens.
Please see schedule o for description
The mission of churches united for community concern is to provide compassionate support to individuals and families needing assistance through contributions of christian and other religious and civic organizations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Agape Mission of Bartlesville Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
- Who funds The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK ↗
- Who funds PRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC ↗
- Who funds ON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOWATA ↗
- Who funds HEARTMATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds K-LIFE OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF SE KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds BARTLESVILLE LIONS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Washington County Senior Citizens ↗
- Who funds HOPESTONE CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds DEWEY ATHLETIC BOOSTERS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE CLINIC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lyon Foundation · Bartlesville Community Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · McAnaw Family Foundation · The Ae and Juanita Richardson Charitable Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · K S Adams Foundation Co-Trust · Ben F and Karen K Baker Charitable Foundation · Kenneth G and Diana Moon Adams Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Hicks Geraldine Charitable B Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- George Miksch Sutton Avian Research Center Inc — 68% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.