· Private foundation
McAnaw Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $7k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF KIDDIE PARK | $50,000 |
| WASHINGTON CO SCHOOL SUPPLY DRIVE | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| ELKS LODGE | $1,000 |
| ANIMAL RESCUE | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| BARTLESVILLE FOP LODGE 117 | $500 |
| BARTLESVILLE ROUND UP CLUB | $500 |
| DEWEY SCHOOL | $66 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -35% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TJTHE JOURNEY HOME INC8× · 2017–2024 · $64k · revenue +51%
- HCHOPESTONE CANCER SUPPORT CENTER7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +119%
- FOFRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK5× · 2018–2022 · $9k · revenue +944%
Funded once
- COCITY OF BARTLESVILLEone grant, 2019 · $7k
- PTPROJECT TRIBUTEone grant, 2023 · $4k
- HHOPESTONEone grant, 2024 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Reduce hunger in pets by providing free pet food and pet services to low income pet owners enabling them to keep their companion animal(s) with them. this includes providing routine vaccinations, spaying/neutering, pet supplies and shelter…
The western oklahoma family care center show's god's love by helping families in western oklahoma overcome barrier in their lives in order to help them become contributinng self-supporting citizens
Provide emergency shelter and meals, case management and assessment to homeless individuals and families from the ashtabula county and surrounding areas.
Humane treatment of stray dogs and cats
The mission of the park county drop in center is to assist those who are struggling with behavioral health challenges, addiction, isolation, and homelessness. the center is a safe place for individuals aged 18 and over experiencing mental…
Our mission is to provide safe/secure low-barrier shelter and food to any adult in need in the Walla Walla region. Our hope is to build upon this foundation to stabilize people's lives while helping them to become self-sufficient. We do…
The Mission Statement for the Okmulgee County Humane Society is to enrich the lives of dogs and cats and provide support to the people who love them when in need - strengthen the overall human-animal bond.
Homeless Shelter
To spread the love of christ to the community by providing quality healthcare and spiritual guidance. the clinic's mission is to provide free medical care and spiritual guidance that minister to the whole person. the clinic will provide…
To provide a safe, comfortable environment for women and children seeking shelter and connect them with resources to help change their lives.
To provide a homeless shelter to indigents and those facing emergency housing needs. we will provide help to them in securing permanent housing. the organization is built on the christian ideal to love our neighbor which includes persons…
Animal rescue foundation inc (arf) rescues homeless dogs and cats in the tulsa area and helps them find loving homes. we do this by rescuing homelss animals out of area shelters, accepting owner surrendered pets, placing them in foster…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Agape Mission of Bartlesville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary Martha Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds HOPESTONE CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
- Who funds Team River Runner Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Mary Martha Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds GREEN COUNTRY FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTHCARE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOL SUPPLY DRIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds NEHEMIAH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BARTLESVILLE PLAYGROUND ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lyon Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation · Bartlesville Community Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation · Bartlesville Regional United Way In · Kenneth G and Diana Moon Adams Foundation · K S Adams Foundation Co-Trust · Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization McAnaw Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Team River Runner Incorporated — 19% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to McAnaw Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to McAnaw Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.