Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barnik Tarbut Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$309k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Youth Development$708kEducation$143kHuman Services$126kHousing & Shelter$124kArts & Culture$111kInternational$79kFood & Nutrition$71kHealth$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$3,180
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND INC$50,000
THE GIVING GROUP COMMUNITY$45,000
THE GIVING GROUP COMMUNITY$29,250
BUILDERS NETWORK$10,000
THE GIVING GROUP COMMUNITY$10,000
GREEN 4 KIDS$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE 2141 CLUB$7,000
THE GIVING BACK FUND$6,500
IMPACT SOCIETY$6,180
GO FUND ME$5,000
ROSTOM SHANAN LA JOLLA FAMILY HOUSE$5,000
THE CHILD PRIMARY SCHOOL$3,712
KINDNESS INITIATIVE$3,600
RESOLUTION PROJECT$3,180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 62% of grant dollars ($930k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 38% that went abroad ($560k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAELI AMERICAN COUNCIL: $5k → 14%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $1k → 17%BEAUTY 2 THE STREETZ: $2k → 14%KINDNESS INITIATIVE: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
AZ
AR
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 38% of all-years giving ($560k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$449k · 12 grants
Poland$100k · 2 grants
Canada$6k · 2 grants
Ukraine$4k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$200 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$966k · 8 repeat orgs$463k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
47

Total granted

$966k
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+65%

Still filing today

25%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $247k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2019–2022 · $695k
  • MS
    MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT
    2× · 2019–2021 · $133k · revenue +46%
  • HH
    HOUSING HELPERS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $88k · revenue -28%

Funded once

  • U
    UNITATEM
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • MP
    MEIR PANIM - MIFAL CHAIM
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • THE BAIL PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
2
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
3
Israel Venture Network

The Organization is at the forefront of the social business arena for fourth sector in Israel, nurturing and growing this emerging sector and generating sustainable social impact by providing Israel's social businesses with knowledge,…

Education
4
Friends of Israeli Flying Aid Inc

Friends of israeli flying aid, inc. raises funds to provide funding to a charitable organization in israel, israeli flying aid, for its charitable mission of supplying humanitarian aid and medical assistance in war torn areas of the world.

Human Services
5
Ziv Partners Inc

Raise funds in support of ziv medical center, which delivers trauma care, advanced mental health treatment, and inclusive healing to israels most diverse and at-risk communities.

Health
6
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
7
Friends of Jerusalem

Friends of Jerusalem's mission is to provide assistance to the needs and indigent living in Jerusalem and all of Israel.

Human Services
8
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
9
Jews for Racial and Economic Justice Action Inc

Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…

—
10
Toldos Eluzer Inc

To provide financial support to charitable organizations that deliver aid, resources, and services to poor, needy, and underprivileged populations.

Human Services
11
Israel Team Advocates International Inc

Promote understanding and support for the people of israel

International
12
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Builders Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Flying Leatherneck Aviation Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $695,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITATEM: $100,000 · OtherUNITATEMIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE GIVING GROUP COMMUNITY: $87,250 · OtherTHE GIVING GROUP COMMUNITY+56 more: $175,159 · Other+56 moreMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $132,660 · EducationMONARCH SC…+2 more: $2,800 · EducationHOUSING HELPERS INC: $88,000 · Housing & ShelterPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $51,800 · PhilanthropyGREEN-4-KIDS: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $6,500 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $3,800 · PhilanthropyISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL: $5,000 · Human ServicesKINDNESS INITIATIVE: $3,600 · Human ServicesBeauty 2 The Streetz: $1,800 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $1,023 · Human ServicesTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $204 · Crime & LegalBUILDERS NETWORK INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,157,409Education$135,460Housing & Shelter$88,000Philanthropy$77,100Human Services$11,423Crime & Legal$10,204Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $132,660 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHOUSING HELPERS INC: $88,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $51,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN-4-KIDS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBUILDERS NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE 2141 CLUB: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDS PRIMARY SCHOOL: $3,712 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKINDNESS INITIATIVE: $3,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO: $3,327 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESOLUTION PROJECT INC: $3,180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIVINGA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJGIVE-FRIENDS OF ASOR FUND USA INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeauty 2 The Streetz: $1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBARBERSHOP BOOKS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $1,023 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZERUZERU: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREAD LIGHTLY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIONS TIGERS AND BEARS: $418 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- NEW YORK: $204 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHIELD OF FREEDOM: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJASA CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING HELPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN-4-KIDS ↗
  • Who funds BUILDERS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE 2141 CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING BACK FUND ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds ISRAELI-AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDS PRIMARY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KINDNESS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds THE RESOLUTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVINGA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barnik Tarbut Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barnik Tarbut Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barnik Tarbut’s filings →

    More from the funding graph