Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barnes Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$259kReligion$51kHuman Services$26kHousing & Shelter$21kEducation$16kArts & Culture$13kFood & Nutrition$10kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $29k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JDRFBREAKTHROUGH T1D$54,000
MISSION REALTY$5,000
ISIAH HOUSE$3,000
HEART OF TEXAS FCA$3,000
ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH$3,000
NORTHWOOD ELEMENTARY$3,000
FRIENDS FOR LIFE$3,000
MENTORING ALLIANCE$3,000
TRI-CITY MINISTRIES$3,000
SOUTH BOSQUE ELEMENTARY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$750
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH LORENA$500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Culinary Institute of America: $3k → 9%JONI & FRIENDS: $3k → 5%WILLOW PARK BAPTIST: $5k → 8%MISSION REALITY: $5k → 11%Juvenille Diabetes Reserch Foundation: $57k → 16%ISIAH HOUSE: $3k → 16%Crisis Center of West Texas: $10k → 16%JUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION (JDRF): $24k → 16%HEART OF TEXAS FCA: $3k → 15%Culinary Institute of America: $3k → 9%WILLOW PARK BAPTIST: $10k → 8%MISSION REALTY: $5k → 11%Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundati: $33k → 16%MENTORING ALLIANCE: $3k → 16%HARMONY HOME: $5k → 16%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $3k → 9%Willow Park Baptist Church: $10k → 8%MISSION REALITY: $5k → 11%Stonegate: $3k → 12%JUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION (JDRF): $19k → 16%FRIENDS FOR LIFE: $3k → 16%PERMIAN BASIN REHAB: $2k → 16%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $3k → 9%MISSION REALTY: $5k → 11%STONEGATE FELLOWSHIP: $3k → 12%JUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION (JDRF): $18k → 16%ARROW CHILD & FAMILY MINISTRIES: $3k → 16%Permian Basin Rehabilitation Center: $2k → 16%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $3k → 9%MISSION REALITY: $5k → 11%Juvenille Diabetes Research Foundat: $18k → 16%PROPER WACO: $2k → 16%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $3k → 9%NORTHWOOD ELEMENTARY: $3k → 16%The Permian Playhouse: $5k → 16%TRI-CITY MINISTRIES: $3k → 16%MISSION WACO: $5k → 16%Permian Playhouse: $5k → 16%MCCAULEY BAPTIST: $5k → 16%MISSION WACO: $4k → 16%ANTIOCH CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $3k → 16%MCCAULEY BAPTIST: $5k → 16%MISSION WACO: $3k → 16%MCCAULEY BAPTIST: $5k → 16%HEART OF TEXAS FCA: $3k → 16%HEART OF TEXAS FCA: $3k → 16%HEART OF TEXAS FCA: $3k → 16%HEART OF TEXAS FCA: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$219k · 20 repeat orgs$242k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$219k
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-3%

Still filing today

35%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +278%
  • CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    3× · 2018–2023 · $9k · revenue +30%
  • ISAIAH 117 HOUSE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • JD
    Juvenille Diabetes Reserch Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $57k
  • JD
    Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundati
    one grant, 2018 · $33k
  • JD
    JUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Meals On Wheels and More Inc

To nourish and enrich the lives of the homebound and other people in need through programs that promote dignity and independent living.

Food & Nutrition
5
Meals On Wheels Waco

Meals on wheels waco nourishes the bodies, minds, and spirits of older adults in the heart of texas through meals, transportation, activities, and volunteer support.

Human Services
6
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services
7
Meals On Wheels Ministry Inc

Empowers older and disabled adults to live independentlly in thier own homes by providing nutritious home-delivered meals, safety checks, socialization, and community connection, which result in an enhanced quality of life and purpose as…

Food & Nutrition
8
Meals On Wheels San Antonio

To provide services which focus on nourishing lives, enabling independence and caring for the most frail and isolated residents in the greater san antonio region.

—
9
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
10
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
11
Christian Home of Pecos

Christain Home

Crime & Legal
12
Muleshoe Meals On Wheels Inc

The Muleshoe Meals on Wheels purpose is to engage in all activities necessary, useful, or expedient, through operative measures and active organizations, to promote and further the interests of the Senior citizens of the area. The purpose…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mentoring Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Northwood Elementary Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION (JDRF): $60,700 · OtherJUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION (JDRF)Juvenille Diabetes Reserch Foundation: $57,000 · OtherJuvenille Diabetes Reserch FoundationJDRFBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $54,000 · OtherJDRFBREAKTHROUGH T1DJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundati: $33,000 · OtherJuvenile Diabetes Research FoundatiJUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $31,500 · OtherJUVENILLE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDJuvenille Diabetes Research Foundat: $18,000 · OtherMISSION REALITY: $16,824 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherHEART OF TEXAS FCA: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+28 more: $106,310 · Other+28 moreMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC: $12,000 · ReligionCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $8,500 · EducationISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $6,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $2,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS FOR LIFE: $3,000 · HealthPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER: $2,000 · HealthWEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC: $1,500 · HealthMENTORING ALLIANCE: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$422,334Religion$12,000Education$8,500Human Services$8,000Health$6,500Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwood Elementary PTA: $5,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR LIFE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH BOSQUE ELEMENTARY PTA PTA TEXAS CONGRESS: $2,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetWEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL: $760 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION WACO MISSION WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Northwood Elementary PTA ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BOSQUE ELEMENTARY PTA PTA TEXAS CONGRESS ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS GIFTS OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barnes Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barnes Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barnes Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barnes Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barnes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph