Skip to content
Barki Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Barki Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$20kHealth$3kHuman Services$3kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$1kEducation$1kFood & Nutrition$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$146k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSINGS COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,100
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
EDMOND MOBILE MEALS$500
FAITH KIDS$250
SALVATION ARMY CENTRAL OKLAHOMA$250
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OKLAHOMA$100
INFANT CRISIS CENTER$50
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $860) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $250 → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $210 → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 16%THE HUGS PROJECT: $100 → 16%WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CA
MD
KS
NC
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 11 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$29k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+12%

Still filing today

36%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +145%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +53%
  • EM
    EDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $1k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CC
    COLUMBUS CORP CHARITIES OF OKC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500
  • SF
    SANTA FE LIFE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Packages From Home

To send care and comfort packages to deployed american military heroes who are stationed in active duty theaters around the world, as well as to facilitate activities that elevate morale of all veterans

Philanthropy
4
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
5
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
6
Uossm Usa

Uossm usas mission is to provide impartial lifesaving support, medical relief and access to quality healthcare and mental health services to people and communities affected by crisis.

Health
7
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
8
Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation

We come here to remember those who were killed, those who survived and those changed forever. may all who leave here know the impact of violence. may this memorial offer comfort, strength, peace, hope and serenity.

Arts & Culture
9
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
Miracle Flights

Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSINGS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10,410 · OtherCROSSINGS COMMUNITY CHURCHST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4,045 · OtherST LUKES UNITED METHODIST CHURCHKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $3,500 · OtherKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUSSALVATION ARMY CENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $2,035 · OtherSALVATION ARMY CENTRAL OKLAHOMAWATER4 (MINISTRIES): $1,550 · OtherWATER4 (MINISTRIES)BRITTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $1,300 · OtherCOLUMBUS CORP CHARITIES OF OKC: $1,100 · OtherEDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC: $1,050 · Other+10 more: $1,569 · Other+10 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,800 · HealthST JUDE CH…FAITH KIDS INC: $250 · HealthFAITH KIDS…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,350 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $660 · Human ServicesWINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC: $100 · Human ServicesTHE HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $100 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropySpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $100 · Recreation & SportsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50 · International
Other$26,559Health$3,050Religion$1,350Education$1,000Human Services$960Philanthropy$500Recreation & Sports$100International$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $660 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER OKC INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds EDMOND MOBILE MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OKC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…The Magnolia Charitab…Harris Foundation IncNatl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · The Magnolia Charitable Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barki Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barki Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barki Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home