Skip to content

· Private foundation

Banner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$109kHealth$67kEnvironment$45kCrime & Legal$22kEducation$21kYouth Development$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$649k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL FAITHS$7,000
GREAT PLAINS RESTORATION COUNCIL$5,000
THE GARDEN'S EDGE$5,000
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$2,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS$2,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,500
ANIMAL HUMANE NEW MEXICO$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$500
THE CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST JOHN$500
GIRLS ON THE RUN$500
EXPLORA MUSEUM$500
ASPCA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES: $15k → 14%FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES: $7k → 14%ALL FAITHS: $7k → 14%ALL FAITHS: $7k → 14%ALL FAITHS: $7k → 14%ALL FAITHS: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NM
DC
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$261k · 20 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$261k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+7%

Still filing today

65%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U
    UNICA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $28k · revenue +14%
  • GP
    GREAT PLAINS RESTORATION COUNCIL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +298%
  • FB
    FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARTIN'S SHELTER
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • NN
    NAVAJO NATION
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • HH
    HEADING HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Protection New Mexico

To protect animals by creating systemic change resulting in the humane treatment of all animals. we create policies, infrastructure, and services that protect animals and strengthen our communities, and we design and implement humane and…

Animals
2
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
3
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
4
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
5
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
6
American Wild Horse Preservation Campaign

The american wild horse campaign is the nation's leading conservation organization dedicated to preserving the freedom and habitat of wild horses and burros. through its initiatives in advocacy, conservation, land preservation, and legal…

Animals
7
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
8
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
9
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
10
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
11
Junglekeepers Inc

As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to conservation and environmental protection, junglekeepers is proud to present a description highlighting our charitable activities in the peruvian amazon. our initiatives align with our…

Human Services
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Albuquerque Habitat for Humanity; the most unlike its peers is Girls On the Run Rio Grande Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALBUQUERQUE HEADING HOME: $56,500 · OtherALBUQUERQUE HEADING HOMEHOPEWORKS: $35,000 · OtherHOPEWORKSALBUQUERQUE HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOME: $25,000 · OtherALBUQUERQUE HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMEST MARTIN'S SHELTER: $7,000 · OtherNAVAJO NATION: $7,000 · Other+16 more: $23,450 · Other+16 moreUNICA: $28,000 · Human ServicesUNICAFATHERS BUILDING FUTURES: $22,000 · Human ServicesFATHERS BUILDING F…GREAT PLAINS RESTORATION COUNCIL: $25,000 · EnvironmentGREAT PLAINS RES…THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FO…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,975 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE F…The Gardens Edge Inc: $20,000 · EducationROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $8,500 · HealthPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $5,000 · HealthHEADING HOME: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterGIRLS ON THE RUN RIO GRANDE INC: $8,500 · Youth Development
Other$153,950Human Services$50,000Environment$42,975Education$20,000Health$13,500Housing & Shelter$9,500Youth Development$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPEWORKS: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNICA: $28,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT PLAINS RESTORATION COUNCIL: $25,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetFATHERS BUILDING FUTURES: $22,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetThe Gardens Edge Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEADING HOME: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $2,975 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
  • Who funds UNICA ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS RESTORATION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds The Gardens Edge Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN RIO GRANDE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds HEADING HOME ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · King-Carpenter Foundation · Club Culturale Italiano Inc · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Banner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Banner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Banner Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Banner Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Banner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph