Skip to content

· Private foundation

Banky Larocque Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$329kArts & Culture$99kAnimals$74kFood & Nutrition$65kCivil Rights$56kReligion$26kEnvironment$25kInternational$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$2,575
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN'S MEDIA CENTER$25,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$13,000
FRONTLINE WOMENS FUND$6,000
EQUALITY NOW$5,181
THE FILM SOCIETY OF NY$5,020
EARTH JUSTICE$3,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$3,139
UNCHAINED AT LAST$2,575
Individual grant recipient$2,510
INDIECOLLECTORG$1,072
WOLF PACK$1,041
UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUND$1,036
Individual grant recipient$1,033
Individual grant recipient$1,030
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $1k → 14%UNCHAINED AT LAST: $3k → 10%FULFILLMENT FUND: $15k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $13k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $13k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $10k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $5k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $2k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $2k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
DE
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$512k · 19 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
28

Total granted

$512k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+52%

Still filing today

58%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +608%
  • WP
    WOLF PARK INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +155%
  • Mercy Ships International
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • WB
    WILSHIRE BLVD TEMPLE CAMPUS
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • TR
    TERRAMAR RESEARCH
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
3
Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

International
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
6
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
7
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
8
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
9
Human Rights Watch Inc

Human rights watch ("hrw") defends the rights of people worldwide. we scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. human rights watch is an independent,…

International
10
UltraViolet Education Fund

Ultraviolet education fund (uvef) is a 501c3 organization. ultraviolet is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives…

Civil Rights
11
Global Network of Women Peacebuilders Inc

The gnwp is a coalition of more than 100 womens rights groups and other civil society organizations continued on schedule o

Civil Rights
12
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ms Foundation for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
17/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILSHIRE TEMPLE FOOD BANK: $63,144 · OtherWILSHIRE TEMPLE FOOD BANKIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWILSHIRE BLVD TEMPLE CAMPUS: $20,000 · OtherWILSHIRE BLVD TEMPLE CAMPUSGREENPEACE INC: $16,000 · OtherSHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST: $15,010 · OtherPAWS OF WAR: $15,000 · OtherWOLF PARK INC: $19,041 · OtherWOLF PARK INC+28 more: $84,402 · Other+28 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $199,761 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONNew York University: $13,000 · EducationNew York University+1 more: $6,000 · EducationFULFILLMENT FUND: $110,000 · Human ServicesFULFILLMENT FUN…+2 more: $3,575 · Human ServicesTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMENS…+4 more: $2,786 · Arts & CultureMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $15,163 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsMercy Ships International: $15,000 · InternationalEquality Now Inc: $10,181 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,139 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $18,000 · AnimalsPAWS OF WAR INC: $5,317 · AnimalsTURTLE CONSERVANCY: $2,050 · Animals
Other$333,597Education$218,761Human Services$113,575Arts & Culture$77,786Civil Rights$46,163International$29,320Animals$25,367

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $199,761 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $110,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $75,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetMS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOLF PARK INC: $19,041 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $15,163 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEquality Now Inc: $10,181 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC: $5,317 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNCHAINED AT LAST INC: $2,575 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURTLE CONSERVANCY: $2,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC: $1,036 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL GIRL MEDIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChildren of the Night: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAKE THE LEAD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPARC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOOK WHAT SHE DID: $350 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FULFILLMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MS FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
  • Who funds CODEPINK WOMEN FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNCHAINED AT LAST INC ↗
  • Who funds TURTLE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Banky Larocque Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Banky Larocque Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Banky Larocque’s filings →

    More from the funding graph