Skip to content
Banfield Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Banfield Foundation

BANFIELD FOUNDATION is committed to improving the well-being of pets & communities by elevating the power of the pet-human bond; strengthening the pet welfare community; providing disaster relief for pets and advancing the science of veterinary medicine.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
85
Grants FY2024still arriving
39
States reached
$301k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$8.8MHealth$857kPublic Safety & Disaster$180kHousing & Shelter$83kHuman Services$75kCrime & Legal$28kEducation$26kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 85 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 85 grants below total $1,849,916, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,819,266 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $969,350 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $190k
  • $10k–50k50 grants · $814k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $545k
  • $250k+1 grant · $301k
$10,000
Median grant
39
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$300,990
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$114,209
HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA$82,212
OUR BIG FAT CARIBBEAN RESCUE$72,391
DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE$60,000
BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER (BARCS)$57,570
SPAY MONTANA$55,600
OKTIBBEHA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$52,500
PENNSYLVANIA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$50,693
UNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB$47,202
THE INNER PUP$40,280
TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE$40,000
REDROVER$40,000
MADISON OGLETHORPE ANIMAL SHELTER$36,013
SOUTHERN PINES ANIMAL SHELTER ( HEALTHY PET CLINIC)$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $15k → 11%180 TURNING LIVES AROUND: $8k → 6%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $65k → 17%FAMILY PLACE INC: $10k → 14%URBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 116 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

116 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2024, 68 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
194

Total granted

$6.1M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+33%

Still filing today

96%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $403k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    Arizona Humane Society
    4× · 2020–2024 · $798k · revenue +82%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $615k · revenue +67%
  • DD
    DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $207k · revenue +321%

Funded once

  • DV
    DEVELOPING VETERINARY MEDICINE CAREERS
    one grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue -71%
  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $117k · revenue +44%
  • DW
    DR WALTER J ERNEST JR VETERINARY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $90k · revenue 0% · 52% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beaverhead Animal Shelter

The mission is to protect and care for homeless animals in the Dillon and Beaverhead county area.

Animals
2
Caloosa Humane Society Inc

The mission of Caloosa Humane Society is to serve, shelter, and protect the homeless pets in our care. We are dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive homes for our companion animals in need. Our no-kill facility provides low…

Education
3
Save a Pet Animal Rescue Inc

Save-A-Pet Animal Rescue believes it is their moral responsibility to protect and improve the lives of abused, abandoned and homeless animals and to place them in loving, permanent homes. They provide spay and neuter services and any…

Animals
4
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
5
Animal Humane Society Veterinary Centers Pc

Provide wellness and spay/neuter services at reduced cost for people in need.

Community Improvement
6
Liberty Humane Society Inc

We aim to improve animal welfare and reduce pet homelessness by providing affordable spay neuter services and wellness care enabling a better future for pets their families and all people who love them.

Animals
7
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
8
Paws and Claws Animal Shelter
Animals
9
Humane Society of Central Illinois

HSCIs mission is to find loving, forever homes for abused and unwanted pets.

Animals
10
Safe Haven Inc
Animals
11
Prevent Homeless Pets

Our mission is to collaborate with individuals and humane rescue groups in order to save the lives of homeless dogs and cats by promoting and facilitating access to affordable, high volume/high quality spay and neuter surgeries in a…

Animals
12
Humane Society of Richland Wilkin Co

To improve the qulity of life for companion animals, to place homeless cats & dogs in suitable homes, & to provide programs to reduce the overpopulation and euthanasia of companion animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Humane Society of Catawba County Dba the Humane Society of Catawba Co; the most unlike its peers is The Serengeti Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

315 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 315 of the 348 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
81
Early backer (in before they grew)
313/315
Grantees still filing
239/315
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEVELOPING VETERINARY MEDICINE CAREERS: $1,516,113 · AnimalsDEVELOPING VETERINARY MEDICINE CAREERSArizona Humane Society: $798,124 · AnimalsArizona Humane SocietyHumane World for Animals Inc: $615,222 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA: $467,513 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA+161 more: $4,113,933 · Animals+161 moreDR WALTER J ERNEST JR VETERINARY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $89,898 · OtherANIMAL BALANCE: $81,032 · OtherUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $40,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $37,373 · OtherSOVEREIGN NATIONS VETERINARY: $32,086 · OtherMARICOPA COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT: $25,200 · OtherROSE BROOKS CENTER INC: $25,000 · OtherMOORE COUNTY CITIZENS PET RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE: $18,520 · Other+16 more: $203,315 · OtherTrustees of Tufts College: $155,000 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $117,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundation: $34,978 · EducationCornell University: $14,530 · Education+1 more: $10,195 · EducationGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $203,750 · PhilanthropyURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $75,000 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $15,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE SERENGETI FOUNDATION: $95,100 · EnvironmentMERCER VETERINARY CLINIC FOR THE HOMELESS: $30,615 · Health
Animals$7,510,905Other$552,424Education$331,703Philanthropy$203,750Human Services$100,000Environment$95,100Health$30,615

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetArizona Humane Society: $798,124 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $615,222 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA: $467,513 over 5y, 20% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $207,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $203,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $155,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR ANIMALS INC: $122,726 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $117,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPALM VALLEY ANIMAL SOCIETY FKA PALM VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER: $99,482 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $99,175 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE INNER PUP: $98,824 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetSpay Montana: $98,600 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHE SERENGETI FOUNDATION: $95,100 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetOur Big Fat Caribbean Rescue Inc: $91,651 over 4y, 24% of budgetDR WALTER J ERNEST JR VETERINARY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $89,898 over 1y, 52% of budgetANIMAL BALANCE: $81,032 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetStarfish Animal Rescue: $77,677 over 2y, 11% of budgetBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS: $77,570 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN RESOURCE INSTITUTE: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNDERDOG ANIMAL RESCUE AND REHAB: $72,202 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetOKTIBBEHA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $67,500 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSOUTHERN PINES ANIMAL SHELTER: $65,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSAIPAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $65,400 over 2y, 23% of budgetTHE GREATER BIRMINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $59,700 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW HUMANE: $59,672 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetYOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN: $55,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAcadiana Animal Aid: $53,559 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMADISON OGLETHORPE ANIMAL SHELTER: $51,794 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $49,320 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLOUISIANA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $47,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SATO PROJECT: $44,944 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $40,701 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNASHVILLE HUMANE ASSOCIATION AKA NASHVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKAUAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $38,261 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SERVICES INC: $38,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF JOHNSON COUNTY: $37,373 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetLIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC: $35,067 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $34,978 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $33,744 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetVeterinarians for Puerto Rico Corp: $31,931 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetSPAY NEUTER NETWORK: $30,772 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMERCER VETERINARY CLINIC FOR THE HOMELESS: $30,615 over 3y, 18% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $29,995 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPAY N SAVE INC: $29,711 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH MISSISSIPPI: $27,896 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNevis Animal Speak: $27,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $26,283 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petco LoveThe American Society …Best Friends Animal S…The Duffield Family F…Petsmart Charities IncBISSELL Pet FoundationGreater Good CharitiesHumane World for Anim…Pedigree FoundationThe Grey Muzzle Organ…Vca CharitiesThe Michelson Found A…
Petco LoveTX195× affinity147 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petco Love · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · Best Friends Animal Society · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Petsmart Charities Inc · BISSELL Pet Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Humane World for Animals Inc · Pedigree Foundation · The Grey Muzzle Organization · Vca Charities · The Michelson Found Animals Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Banfield Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Banfield Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • People for Animals Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rowan University Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Animal Rescue League of Boston: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Banfield Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Banfield Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 348 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Banfield’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home