Skip to content
Baisley Powell Elebash Fund Xxxxx5009 at a glance

· Private foundation

Baisley Powell Elebash Fund Xxxxx5009

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2022
16
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$6.2MEducation$1.6MHuman Services$300kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2022 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.0M
$175,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$91k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC$1,000,000
MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS$450,000
THE HARLEM CHAMBER PLAYERS$300,000
BROOKLYN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$300,000
THE JAZZ GALLERY$225,000
GREENWICH HOUSE INC$200,000
ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC$200,000
RATTLESTICK PRODUCTIONS INC$175,000
AFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK$150,000
BROOKLYN BALLET$150,000
BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC$150,000
GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS$100,000
KINGS MAJESTIC CORP DBA 651 ARTS$100,000
SOCIETY OF THE THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL$100,000
CLASSICAL THEATRE OF HARLEM$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ARTS BUSINESS COLLABORATIVE INC: $25k → 13%RATTLESTICK PRODUCTIONS INC: $175k → 17%KINGS MAJESTIC CORP DBA 651 ARTS: $100k → 20%BRONX ARTS ENSEMBLE: $75k → 28%BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $250k → 17%GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1.0M → 17%KINGS MAJESTIC CORP DBA 651 ARTS: $100k → 20%BRONX ARTS ENSEMBLE: $75k → 28%BOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $250k → 17%GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 17%GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS: $100k → 28%AFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK: $150k → 17%AFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK: $150k → 17%BROOKLYN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $300k → 20%AFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK: $50k → 17%Roulette Intermedium Inc: $250k → 20%MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $450k → 17%ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $250k → 20%MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $300k → 17%ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $200k → 20%THE HARLEM CHAMBER PLAYERS: $300k → 17%BROOKLYN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $150k → 20%MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $250k → 17%BROOKLYN CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $150k → 20%MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS: $150k → 17%BROOKLYN BALLET: $150k → 20%CLASSICAL THEATRE OF HARLEM: $100k → 17%ORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $75k → 17%THE HARLEM CHAMBER PLAYERS: $50k → 17%THE HARLEM CHAMBER PLAYERS: $50k → 17%THE JAZZ GALLERY: $225k → 17%GREENWICH HOUSE INC: $200k → 17%THE JAZZ GALLERY: $125k → 17%AMERICAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTA LEAGUE: $175k → 17%American Composers Orchestra Inc: $75k → 17%BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $175k → 17%AMERICAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTA LEAGUE: $175k → 17%GREENWICH HOUSE INC: $50k → 17%BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $175k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLES CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY: $150k → 17%GREENWICH HOUSE INC: $50k → 17%BLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $150k → 17%Young Peoples Chorus of New York City: $150k → 17%SOCIETY OF THE THIRD STREET MUSIC SCHOOL: $100k → 17%HARMONY PROJECT: $100k → 17%HARMONY PROJECT: $100k → 17%NEW MUSIC USA: $175k → 17%NEW MUSIC USA: $175k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 18 repeat orgs$800k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$7.5M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+60%

Still filing today

72%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +214%
  • RI
    ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $700k · revenue +63%
  • TB
    THE BROOKLYN QUEENS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $600k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • OC
    ORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +18%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

—
2
BlackBox Ensemble Inc

To present and promote contemporary classical music through innovative, interdisciplinary performances; to support living composers; and to engage diverse audiences through education, collaboration, and community-based programming.…

Arts & Culture
3
Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians Nyc Chapter Inc

Our primary mission is to present concerts that represent the music of AACM Composers. The concert activities are designed to bring new American music to the general public and to create an atmosphere that is conducive for the artistically…

—
4
Jeunes Virtuoses De New York Inc

Jeunes Virtuoses de New York" (JVNY) is an ensemble of exceptionally accomplished young musicians who perform on both sides of the Atlantic both as a string camerata, and in various chamber music configurations. Our mission is to transform…

Arts & Culture
5
The Wharton Institute for the Performing Arts Inc

To offer accessible, high-quality performing arts education that sparks personal growth and builds inclusive communities. its vision is to transform performing arts education in an inclusive community accessible to all.

—
6
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
7
Lyrica Baroque

The mission of lyrica baroque is to support a diverse community of students, teachers, artists, institutions and audiences of all ages through education, collaboration and performance. lyrica baroque seeks to promote the extraordinary…

Arts & Culture
8
The Diller-Quaile School of Music Inc

For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…

Arts & Culture
9
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture
10
Lehman College Center for the Performing Arts Inc

To provide the bronx & surrounding areas with access to affordable local, national, & international performances that educate & celebrate the traditions of a multi-cultural community.

Arts & Culture
11
Cantata Profana Inc

Cantata Profana, Inc. (www.cantataprofana.com) is a vocal and instrumental chamber ensemble that presents concerts of classical and chamber music ranging from the Baroque to modern eras with a unique narrative style. Our purpose is to…

Arts & Culture
12
Queens Opera Theatre

To educate the general public of new york on all aspects of opera through opera productions, lectures, classes, camps, social media, newsletters, etc. while emphasizing the need to make opera accessible and affordable to all people, no…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Young People's Chorus of New York City Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jazz Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $700,000 · Arts & CultureROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INCTHE BROOKLYN QUEENS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $600,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN QUEENS CONSERVATORY OF MUSICMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $600,000 · Arts & CultureMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $550,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSICBLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $500,000 · Arts & CultureBLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSICThe Harlem Chamber Players Inc: $400,000 · Arts & CultureThe Harlem Chamber Players IncNEW MUSIC USA INC: $350,000 · Arts & CultureNEW MUSIC USA INCTHE JAZZ GALLERY: $350,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JAZZ GALLERYAFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK INC: $350,000 · Arts & CultureAFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK INCTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC+5 more: $550,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,100,000 · OtherTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INCBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $500,000 · OtherBOARD OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAAMERICAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTA LEAGUE: $350,000 · OtherAMERICAN SYMPHONY ORCHESTA LEAGUEGREENWICH HOUSE INC: $300,000 · OtherGREENWICH HOUSE INCKINGS MAJESTIC CORP DBA 651 ARTS: $200,000 · OtherKINGS MAJESTIC CORP DBA 651 ARTSHARMONY PROJECT: $200,000 · OtherHARMONY PROJECTRATTLESTICK PRODUCTIONS INC: $175,000 · OtherRATTLESTICK PRODUCTIONS INC+3 more: $250,000 · Other+3 moreArts Business Collaborative: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$5,250,000Other$3,075,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,100,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetROULETTE INTERMEDIUM INC: $700,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN QUEENS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $600,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $600,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $550,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOMINGDALE SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $500,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetThe Harlem Chamber Players Inc: $400,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetNEW MUSIC USA INC: $350,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetTHE JAZZ GALLERY: $350,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetAFRO-LATIN JAZZ ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK INC: $350,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $300,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetRATTLESTICK PRODUCTIONS INC: $175,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetBRONX ARTS ENSEMBLE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetBROOKLYN BALLETINC: $150,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS: $100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CLASSICAL THEATRE OF HARLEM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetORPHEUS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetArts Business Collaborative: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Howard Gilman Fou…The Hyde and Watson F…The New York Communit…Booth Ferris Foundati…The Fan Fox and Lesli…The Ford FoundationThe Andrew W Mellon F…The Aaron Copland Fun…New Music USA IncCornelia T Bailey Cha…The Gladys Krieble De…Jerome Foundation Inc
The Howard Gilman Foundation IncNY34.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The Aaron Copland Fund for Music Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · New Music USA Inc · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · The Gladys Krieble Delmas Foundation · Jerome Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baisley Powell Elebash Fund Xxxxx5009 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baisley Powell Elebash Fund Xxxxx5009. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baisley Powell Elebash Fund Xxxxx5009’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home