Skip to content
Baccash Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Baccash Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$254k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$160kHealth$157kHuman Services$129kPhilanthropy$125kPublic Safety & Disaster$71kYouth Development$69kFood & Nutrition$48kReligion$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$10,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$125,000
LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL$30,000
HONORING OUR PRECIOUS ELDERS HOPE$20,000
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$15,000
MARIST BROTHERS$13,000
ALZHEIMERS FAMILY SENIOR CENTER$10,500
FROSTED FACES FOUNDATION$10,000
EPARCHY OF OUR LADY OF LEBANON$10,000
SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION$10,000
MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDA$8,200
CA MASONIC FOUNDATION$1,500
UNICEF$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PALS PROGRAM: $1k → 6%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 8%SHELTER BOX USA: $15k → 9%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 8%SHELTER BOX USA: $15k → 9%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 8%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 8%CATERINA'S CLUB: $8k → 10%CATERINA'S CLUB: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
NY
OR
IN
PA
CA
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Baccash Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Baccash Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$677k · 24 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
23

Total granted

$677k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+26%

Still filing today

54%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Living Water International
    7× · 2018–2024 · $98k · revenue +1%
  • ND
    NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $71k · revenue +9%
  • AW
    Age Well Senior Services Inc
    4× · 2018–2021 · $65k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CD
    CONGREGATION DE FRERES MARISTES AU LIBAN
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • JB
    JOAN B KROC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • HI
    HOMELESS INTERVENTION SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

—
8
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
9
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
10
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
11
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
12
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
23/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMERS FAMILY SENIOR CENTER: $98,150 · OtherALZHEIMERS FAMILY SENIOR CENTERAge Well Senior Services Inc: $65,000 · OtherAge Well Senior Services IncMEDSHARE: $45,000 · OtherMEDSHAREHONORING OUR PRECIOUS ELDERS HOPE: $43,500 · OtherHONORING OUR PRECIOUS ELDERS HOPEORANGE COUNTY FOOD ACCESS COALITION: $33,000 · OtherORANGE COUNTY FOOD ACCESS COALITIONHAWAIIAN EYE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherHAWAIIAN EYE FOUNDATION INCST LUCY'S PRIORY HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherMARIST BROTHERS OF THE SCHOOLS INC: $18,000 · OtherEPARCHY OF OUR LADY OF LEBANON: $15,000 · Other+20 more: $63,715 · Other+20 moreLiving Water International: $97,500 · Human ServicesLiving Water Inter…SHELTERBOX USA INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERBOX USA INCCATERINAS CLUB: $9,500 · Human ServicesCATERINAS CLUB+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $125,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHR…MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,856 · PhilanthropyMOUNTAINS COMMUNIT…+2 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $71,000 · HealthNATIONAL DISAST…HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $35,550 · HealthHOAG HOSPITAL F…BREAST CANCER ANGELS: $10,000 · HealthBREAST CANCER A…+4 more: $1,000 · HealthFROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INC: $20,190 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife: $2,000 · AnimalsTIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationHUNGER FIGHTERS OREGON: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$431,365Human Services$138,000Philanthropy$137,856Health$117,550Animals$22,190Education$6,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Water International: $97,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $71,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAge Well Senior Services Inc: $65,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $35,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAIIAN EYE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INC: $20,190 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBREAST CANCER ANGELS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB: $9,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8,856 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBraking Cycles: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER FIGHTERS OREGON: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALS Programs: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT VISION HAWAII: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Living Water International ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Age Well Senior Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAIIAN EYE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FROSTED FACES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds CATERINAS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIYYA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Braking Cycles ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER FIGHTERS OREGON ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Rotary International Club Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PALS Programs ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VISION HAWAII ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baccash Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baccash Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Casa of Clackamas County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Baccash Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home