Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ayers Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$408k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$57k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$822kInternational$787kHuman Services$326kRecreation & Sports$299kArts & Culture$263kYouth Development$242kHousing & Shelter$82kHealth$78kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $266k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $107k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGAHOZO-SHALOMN YOUTH VILLAGE$57,265
PERUVIAN HEARTS$50,000
ANGELS' PLACE INC$36,000
PEOPLE OF PERU PROJECT$30,000
CORAZON DE ESPERANZA INC$30,000
MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
PERU CHAMPS ASSOCIATION$25,000
YORK STREET PROJECT$20,000
ZEBRA YOUTH$20,000
HOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND$10,000
INDUSTRIAL ARTS WORKSHOP INC$10,000
TRYING TOGETHER$10,000
PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH$10,000
HERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEKIMA PLACE INC: $56k → 11%SARAH'S PLACE WOMEN'S RESOURCE: $25k → 27%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICE: $15k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $10k → 14%SARAH'S PLACE WOMEN'S RESOURCE: $15k → 27%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%SARAH'S PLACE WOMEN'S RESOURCE: $15k → 27%SARAH'S PLACE WOMEN'S RESOURCE: $15k → 27%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5k → 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%RUTH'S WAY INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
AR
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 26 repeat orgs$447k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
31

Total granted

$2.6M
$363k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+29%

Still filing today

81%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AY
    AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $467k · revenue +109%
  • PH
    PERUVIAN HEARTS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $382k · revenue +7%
  • AP
    Angels Place Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $246k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • HP
    HEKIMA PLACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $56k · revenue +59%
  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • DU
    DREXEL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
3
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
6
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
7
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
The Agnes Irwin School

The agnes irwin school empowers girls to learn, to lead, and to live a legacy. agnes irwin provides girls with a deep foundation in the humanities, mathematics and science, wellness and athletics. in an inclusive setting that values…

Education
12
Highlands Hospital

Highlands hospital is committed to providing health care to the community in a competent, nurturing and healing environment. our staff will provide support in times of crisis and furnish the resources necessary to promote a healthy…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zebra Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Peru Champs Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
36/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Angels Place Inc: $246,000 · OtherAngels Place IncPERU CHAMPS ASSOCIATION: $175,000 · OtherPERU CHAMPS ASSOCIATIONJAMES CONNECTION: $83,000 · OtherJAMES CONNECTIONCOMMUNITY PARK ASSOCIATION: $74,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARK ASSOCIATIONTHE SOCIETY FOR ART IN CRAFTS: $50,500 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · OtherCANCER BRIDGES: $45,000 · OtherGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $37,500 · Other+28 more: $312,960 · Other+28 moreAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC: $467,265 · EducationAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH V…PERU CHAMPS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · EducationPERU CHAMPS ASSOCIATIO…+6 more: $89,000 · Education+6 morePEOPLE OF PERU PROJECT: $247,000 · InternationalPEOPLE OF PERU PR…LUZ DE VIDA FORMERLY CORAZON DE ESPERANZA INC: $207,000 · InternationalLUZ DE VIDA FORME…HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalPERUVIAN HEARTS: $382,200 · Youth DevelopmentPERUVIAN HEARTSZEBRA YOUTH INC: $20,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $75,000 · Human ServicesSarah's Place Women's Resource Center Inc: $70,000 · Human ServicesHEKIMA PLACE INC: $55,767 · Human ServicesBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $10,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesPITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC: $111,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $55,000 · Arts & CultureINDUSTRIAL ARTS WORKSHOP INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND: $80,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,063,960Education$606,265International$484,000Youth Development$412,200Human Services$230,767Arts & Culture$198,000Philanthropy$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC: $467,265 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPERUVIAN HEARTS: $382,200 over 8y, 16% of budgetPEOPLE OF PERU PROJECT: $247,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetAngels Place Inc: $246,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetLUZ DE VIDA FORMERLY CORAZON DE ESPERANZA INC: $207,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetPITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC: $111,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND: $80,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $75,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARK ASSOCIATION: $74,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetSarah's Place Women's Resource Center Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR ART IN CRAFTS: $50,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPERU CHAMPS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCANCER BRIDGES: $45,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDUSTRIAL ARTS WORKSHOP INC: $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetEDUCATION MATTERS AFRICA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHOSANNA HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZEBRA YOUTH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTRYING TOGETHER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHAMBURGER HOME: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYORK STREET PROJECT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAPPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARH FOUNDATION FOR HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES INC: $12,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetBROAD STREET MINISTRY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWonderspring: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO RICHMOND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMANI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Virginia: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZERO PROSTATE CANCER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH FILMMAKERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTHS WAY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds PERUVIAN HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE OF PERU PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Angels Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds LUZ DE VIDA FORMERLY CORAZON DE ESPERANZA INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS CHILDREN'S EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Sarah's Place Women's Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEKIMA PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR ART IN CRAFTS ↗
  • Who funds PERU CHAMPS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER BRIDGES ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds INDUSTRIAL ARTS WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION MATTERS AFRICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSANNA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ZEBRA YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds TRYING TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds HAMBURGER HOME ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds YORK STREET PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARH FOUNDATION FOR HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BROAD STREET MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE ABLEGAMERS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA31.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Grable Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Fine Foundation · Opportunity Foundation · McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na · The Buhl Foundation · Wi Patterson Charitable Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ayers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ayers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • York Street Project: 32% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ayers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ayers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ayers’ filings →

More from the funding graph