Skip to content

· Private foundation

Avalon Nature Preserve Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$471k
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$185k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Environment$813kPhilanthropy$321kArts & Culture$196kPublic Safety & Disaster$126kAnimals$42kRecreation & Sports$9kFood & Nutrition$9kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $345k
$500
Median grant
14
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLAGE OF HEAD OF THE HARBOR$185,000
STONY BROOK FOUNDATION$159,500
THE SAFINA CENTER$27,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
PECONIC LAND TRUST$22,910
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,276
SAVE THE SOUND$10,000
SWEETBRIAR NATURE CENTER$5,000
WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION$2,500
FRANK MELVILLE MEMORIAL PARK$2,500
OLD FIELD FARM LTD$2,000
SAVE-A-PET$1,200
PIVOT WORKS INC$1,000
LAND TRUST ALLIANCE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $206 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $206 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%ISLAND HARVEST: $206 → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $206 → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $206 → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $155 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 54 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
18

Total granted

$1.5M
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+7%

Still filing today

74%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentHealthInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $321k · revenue +80%
  • TW
    THE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD
    5× · 2021–2025 · $181k · revenue +16%
  • ST
    SAVE THE SOUND
    4× · 2021–2025 · $105k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SAINT JAMES FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +96% · 58% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND NATIVE PLANT INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
10
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
11
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
12
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Long Island Native Plant Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
39/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLAGE OF HEAD OF THE HARBOR: $356,474 · OtherVILLAGE OF HEAD OF THE HARBORIndividual grant recipient: $122,611 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSWEETBRIAR NATURE CENTER: $72,500 · OtherSWEETBRIAR NATURE CENTERTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $66,200 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYWILDLIFE KIDS CLUB INTERNATIONAL INC: $25,000 · Other+38 more: $59,610 · Other+38 moreSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $320,700 · EducationSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION…+4 more: $5,681 · EducationSAVE THE SOUND: $105,000 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUNDTHE CARL SAFINA CENTER INC THE SAFINA CENTER: $100,000 · EnvironmentTHE CARL SAFINA CENT…PECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $83,940 · EnvironmentPECONIC LAND TRUST I…+8 more: $13,448 · EnvironmentTHE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD: $181,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WARD MELV…OLD FIELD FARM LTD: $6,700 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $10,150 · Arts & CultureTHE SAINT JAMES FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATED: $125,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $4,200 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2,540 · AnimalsTHE SATO PROJECT: $1,236 · AnimalsTURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $700 · Animals+6 more: $1,506 · AnimalsThe American Himalayan Foundation: $2,700 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,615 · InternationalPIVOT WORKS INC: $1,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $680 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $616 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $612 · International+1 more: $42 · International
Other$702,395Education$326,381Environment$302,388Arts & Culture$197,850Public Safety & Disaster$125,000Animals$12,182International$8,265

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $320,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD: $181,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetTHE SAINT JAMES FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATED: $125,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $105,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CARL SAFINA CENTER INC THE SAFINA CENTER: $100,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $83,940 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $66,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOLD FIELD FARM LTD: $6,700 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetLONG ISLAND SEAPORT & ECOCENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetLONGHOUSE RESERVE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHALLOCKVILLE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThree Village Community Trust Inc: $5,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $4,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Himalayan Foundation: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,615 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $2,540 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE VILLAGE GARDEN CLUB: $2,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SATO PROJECT: $1,236 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,134 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,112 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK: $1,024 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,012 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOT WORKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLONG ISLAND NATIVE PLANT INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $813 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $618 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $616 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $612 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC: $608 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $406 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $365 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $330 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $264 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $209 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $170 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE SAINT JAMES FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds THE CARL SAFINA CENTER INC THE SAFINA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds OLD FIELD FARM LTD ↗
  • Who funds LONG ISLAND SEAPORT & ECOCENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LONGHOUSE RESERVE ↗
  • Who funds HALLOCKVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Three Village Community Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Himalayan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE VILLAGE GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE SATO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds BORDERLANDS RESTORATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PIVOT WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds TURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Avalon Nature Preserve Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Avalon Nature Preserve Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Avalon Nature Preserve’s filings →

More from the funding graph