· Private foundation
Atwood Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $124k
- $10k–50k52 grants · $992k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $210,000 |
| ANCHORAGE MUSEUM ASSOCIATION | $175,000 |
| ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY | $150,000 |
| ANCHORAGE OPERA | $125,000 |
| ANCHORAGE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $120,000 |
| ANCHORAGE CONCERT ASSOCIATION | $100,000 |
| ALASKA JUNIOR THEATER | $70,000 |
| CYRANO'S THEATER COMPANY | $65,000 |
| NORTHERN CULTURE EXCHANGE | $60,000 |
| FORAKER GROUP | $60,000 |
| ANCHORAGE DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP LTD | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| ANCHORAGE COMMUNITY THEATRE | $45,000 |
| PULSE DANCE COMPANY | $42,000 |
| ALASKA YOUTH ORCHESTRAS | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $208k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of Atwood Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
93 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $233k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAlaska Pacific University8× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +57%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +17%
- AMAnchorage Museum Association8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +23%
Funded once
- AMAlaska Mountain & Wilderness Huts Association dba Alaska Huts Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +78% · 33% of their budget
- AHAK HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2017 · $34k
- SPSOBROSOL PRODUCTIONS INCone grant, 2022 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Alaska residents benefit from free public admission to an arts and culture festival; the week-long festival encourages non-professional musicians and performers, and has been operating since 1975.
Organize, promote, and produce a 10 day winter music festival which provides workshops for learning, a stage for performing, and professional guest artists for entertaining. An estimated 10,000 people attend the festival annually from all…
Anchorage opera is the center of the artistic creation, innovation and education through the presentation of opera and related events encouraging public collaboration and community engagement for the people of the state of alaska.
AK Wins promotes responsible economic development, fiscal policy and general prosperity by educating, engaging and empowering Alaskans on important public policy issues.
To educate the public about hisroric preservation and help restore and preserve historic sites.
To provide access, facilities, recreation, and educational opportunities within the alpine environment of Chugach State Park.
ACB, an affiliate of the Center for the Book of the Library of Congress, is a non-profit, all volunteer organization celebrating the richness and diversity of language. We were founded in 1991 to stimulate public interest in literacy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inside Out Media. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Alaska Pacific University ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Museum Association ↗
- Who funds The Alaska Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds ANCHORAGE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Concert Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Alaska Junior Theater Inc ↗
- Who funds Northen Culture Exchange ↗
- Who funds Cyrano's Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds THE FORAKER GROUP ↗
- Who funds ANCHORAGE COMMUNITY THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds PULSE DANCE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM DANCE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds ALASKA WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ALASKA CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds SITKA MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds Alaska Youth Orchestras ↗
- Who funds Alaska Dance Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds Alaska Press Club ↗
- Who funds ALASKA ARTS SOUTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds Alaska Mountain & Wilderness Huts Association dba Alaska Huts Association ↗
- Who funds KEYS TO LIFE ↗
- Who funds ALASKA HUMANITIES FORUM ↗
- Who funds ANCHORAGE CONCERT CHORUS ↗
- Who funds Alaska Aviation Museum ↗
- Who funds Out North ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds ANCHORAGE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds ALASKA SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSN INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ANCHORAGE DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP LTD ↗
- Who funds ALASKA ZOO ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Classical Ballet Academy ↗
- Who funds Alaska Theatre of Youth ↗
- Who funds ALASKA SOUND CELEBRATION A CHAPTER OF SWEET ADELINES INTERNATIONAL CHORUS ↗
- Who funds Perseverance Theatre Incorporated ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · The Carr Foundation Inc · Alaska Humanities Forum · Frances & David Rose Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The CIRI Foundation · Alaska Children's Trust · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · Anchorage Mayors Charity Ball · Gottstein Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Atwood Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Atwood Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Atwood Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.