· Public charity
Alaska Humanities Forum
The ALASKA HUMANITIES FORUM connects alaskans through stories, ideas, and experiences that positively change lives and strengthen communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $80,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $95,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEYS TO LIFE | $10,000 |
| KOKHANOK VILLAGE COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| DATA FOR INDIGENOUS JUSTICE | $10,000 |
| OUT NORTH | $10,000 |
| NATIVE VILLAGE OF SHAKTOOLIK | $10,000 |
| CHUGACH REGIONAL RESOURCES | $10,000 |
| KTOO PUBLIC MEDIA | $10,000 |
| KETCHIKAN WELLNESS COALITION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AARTCHANGE4× · 2018–2021 · $49k · revenue +7% · 85% of their budget
- AMAnchorage Museum Association4× · 2017–2021 · $33k · revenue +23%
- SOSpirit of Youth3× · 2019–2021 · $31k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- NANORTH AMERICAN TRADITIONAL INDIAN VALUES ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INCone grant, 2022 · $15k
- TLTHE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INCone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -60%
- OCOsborn Creative LLCone grant, 2017 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Katmai Conservancy supports the preservation of Katmai National Park and Preserve its unique ecosystems scenic character and associated natural and cultural resources by promoting greater public interest appreciation and support through…
To educate the public about hisroric preservation and help restore and preserve historic sites.
To promote and celebrate the uniqueness of alaska native arts and heritage. improve the economic well being of alaska native artists; invigorate education and training of the next generation of alaska native artists; increase awareness of…
Alaska residents benefit from free public admission to an arts and culture festival; the week-long festival encourages non-professional musicians and performers, and has been operating since 1975.
The alaska museum of science and nature is dedicated to the education and exploration of our scientific and natural world.
To Harness the power of the diverse people of Alaska and their communities to empower and support transformative social change. Stand Up Alaska is an Alaskan-led movement providing intersectional and diverse views on issues affecting all…
Cultural activities and classes - 20 participants per class - 6 classes
The collection, preservation and public presentation of Alaskas aviation history, 1897-present.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clausen Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARTCHANGE ↗
- Who funds KTOO PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Museum Association ↗
- Who funds Spirit of Youth ↗
- Who funds KEYS TO LIFE ↗
- Who funds ALASKA JEWISH HISTORICAL MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds JUNEAU ARTS & HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Out North ↗
- Who funds Museum of the Aleutians ↗
- Who funds SEE STORIES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ALASKA ARTS GROUP ↗
- Who funds BETHEL BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds BUNNELL STREET ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHELDON MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds KAWERAK INC ↗
- Who funds Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc ↗
- Who funds The Alaska Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds JUNEAU COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds Yukon River Drainage Fisheries Association ↗
- Who funds SITKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds VALDEZ MUSEUM & HISTORICAL ARCHIVE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Story Works Alaska ↗
- Who funds Denali Arts Council Inc ↗
- Who funds Kodiak Historical Society ↗
- Who funds SEALASKA HERITAGE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ALASKAN COASTAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds Alaska Aviation Museum Endowment ↗
- Who funds Fairbanks Childrens Museum ↗
- Who funds KUAC FRIENDS GROUP ↗
- Who funds KOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ATHABASCAN FIDDLERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRATERNAL ORDER OF ALASKA STATE TROOPERS CHARITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AFFINITY FILMS INC ↗
- Who funds Identity Inc ↗
- Who funds ALUTIIQ HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rasmuson Foundation · The Alaska Community Foundation · Museums Alaska Inc · Atwood Foundation Inc · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · The CIRI Foundation · Frances & David Rose Foundation · The Carr Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Alaska Children's Trust · The Usibelli Foundation · Charlotte y Martin Foundation-Ima
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alaska Humanities Forum funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.