Skip to content
Association for Utah Community Health at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Association for Utah Community Health

Provide increased access to comprehensive health care to medically underserved.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.3MCivil Rights$349kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $165,403, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,873,375 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,707,972 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
$15,999
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mountainlands Community Health Center$30,066
Creek Valley Health Clinic$28,801
Community Health Centers Inc$18,931
Utah Partners for Health$17,232
Carbon Medical Service Association$15,999
Southwest Utah Community Health Center (Family Healthcare)$13,852
Utah Navajo Health Systems$13,500
Wayne Community Health Center$12,022
Midtown Community Health Center$7,500
Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Creek Valley Health Clinic: $29k → 17%MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT: $129k → 8%MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $132k → 9%BEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $143k → 9%ENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CLINIC: $64k → 10%WAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $151k → 12%GREEN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER: $63k → 12%PAIUTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UTAH: $116k → 13%CARBON MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $165k → 14%UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEMS: $142k → 23%MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT: $124k → 8%MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $114k → 9%BEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $93k → 9%ENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CLINIC: $54k → 10%WAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $117k → 12%GREEN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER: $61k → 12%PAIUTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UTAH: $112k → 13%CARBON MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $75k → 14%UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEMS: $98k → 23%MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT: $112k → 8%MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $87k → 9%BEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $86k → 9%ENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CLINIC: $29k → 10%WAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $89k → 12%PAIUTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UTAH: $68k → 13%CARBON MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $69k → 14%UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEMS: $59k → 23%COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECT: $39k → 8%MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $66k → 9%MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT: $32k → 8%MIDTOWN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $31k → 9%Mountainlands Community Health Center: $30k → 8%MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT: $30k → 8%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $64k → 8%MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT: $28k → 8%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $45k → 8%SOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CEN: $131k → 10%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $43k → 8%SOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CEN: $117k → 10%UTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $41k → 8%SOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CEN: $96k → 10%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $37k → 8%SOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CEN: $75k → 10%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $31k → 8%SOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CEN: $57k → 10%UTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $30k → 8%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $29k → 8%COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $27k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 14 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$4.6M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-2%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Mountainlands Community Health Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $525k · revenue +88%
  • MC
    Midtown Community Health Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $487k · revenue +30%
  • WC
    WAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $436k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • OR
    OTHER RECIPIENTS 5000
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CH
    Community Health Connect
    one grant, 2018 · $39k · revenue -23%
  • HW
    HEALTH WEST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Upper Valley Comm Health Services Inc

UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…

Health
3
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
4
Mountain Valleys Health Centers

We serve our rural communities with complete quality care and friendly customer service, providing exceptional healthcare for all.

—
5
Black Canyon Community Health Center Inc

Provide medical services to all persons in need in a rural community more than 50 miles from any other service.

Health
6
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
7
Henderson County Rural Health Center Inc

To provide medical and dental care to under and uninsured patients

Health
8
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
9
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
10
Nevada Health Centers Inc

NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…

Health
11
Family Health Services Corporation

Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.

Health
12
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Green River Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mountainlands Community Health Center: $524,834 · HealthMountainlands Community Health CenterMidtown Community Health Center Inc: $486,821 · HealthMidtown Community Health Center IncWAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $435,719 · HealthWAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCUTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $404,302 · HealthUTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INCCARBON MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOC: $398,272 · HealthCARBON MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOCBEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $376,871 · HealthBEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $316,553 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCGREEN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC: $197,636 · HealthGREEN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INCUTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $181,669 · HealthWasatch Homeless Health Care: $127,168 · Health+2 more: $63,788 · HealthSOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEALTH CEN: $535,954 · OtherSOUTHWEST UTAH COMMUNITY HEA…PAIUTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UTAH: $348,977 · OtherPAIUTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UTAHENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CLINIC: $202,038 · OtherENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CL…OTHER RECIPIENTS 5000: $49,719 · Other+2 more: $48,586 · Other
Health$3,513,633Other$1,185,274

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMountainlands Community Health Center: $524,834 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetMidtown Community Health Center Inc: $486,821 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetWAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $435,719 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetUTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $404,302 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCARBON MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOC: $398,272 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetBEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $376,871 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $316,553 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CLINIC: $202,038 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetGREEN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC: $197,636 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetUTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH: $181,669 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care: $127,168 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCREEK VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC: $54,037 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Health Connect: $38,909 over 1y, 18% of budgetHEALTH WEST INC: $9,751 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mountainlands Community Health Center ↗
  • Who funds Midtown Community Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds CARBON MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds BEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
  • Who funds CREEK VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Community Health Connect ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH WEST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Delta Dental Communit…Direct ReliefIntermountain Communi…Ihc Health Services I…C Scott & Dorothy E W…American Cancer Socie…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Delta Dental Community Care FoundationCA23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Direct Relief · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Ihc Health Services Inc · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association for Utah Community Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association for Utah Community Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Association for Utah Community Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home