· Public charity
Association for Utah Community Health
Provide increased access to comprehensive health care to medically underserved.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $165,403 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,873,375 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,707,972 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mountainlands Community Health Center | $30,066 |
| Creek Valley Health Clinic | $28,801 |
| Community Health Centers Inc | $18,931 |
| Utah Partners for Health | $17,232 |
| Carbon Medical Service Association | $15,999 |
| Southwest Utah Community Health Center (Family Healthcare) | $13,852 |
| Utah Navajo Health Systems | $13,500 |
| Wayne Community Health Center | $12,022 |
| Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah | $7,500 |
| Midtown Community Health Center | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMountainlands Community Health Center9× · 2017–2025 · $525k · revenue +88%
- MCMidtown Community Health Center Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $487k · revenue +30%
- WCWAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $436k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- OROTHER RECIPIENTS 5000one grant, 2017 · $50k
- CHCommunity Health Connectone grant, 2018 · $39k · revenue -23%
- HWHEALTH WEST INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
We serve our rural communities with complete quality care and friendly customer service, providing exceptional healthcare for all.
Provide medical services to all persons in need in a rural community more than 50 miles from any other service.
Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.
To provide medical and dental care to under and uninsured patients
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.
NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…
Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.
To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Green River Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mountainlands Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds Midtown Community Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds WAYNE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH NAVAJO HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds CARBON MEDICAL SERVICE ASSOC ↗
- Who funds BEAR LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds ENTERPRISE VALLEY MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds GREEN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
- Who funds CREEK VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Community Health Connect ↗
- Who funds HEALTH WEST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Direct Relief · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Ihc Health Services Inc · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Association for Utah Community Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.