Skip to content
Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc

In accordance with its mission statement, the aspirus riverview foundation is committed to the communities it serves and to responsibly represent its donors by:1) supporting the work of aspirus riverview hospital and clinics, inc.2) reducing substance abuse and addiction3) improving mental health, especially in adolescents4) improving…

$6.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$5.4MHuman Services$374kPhilanthropy$358kFood & Nutrition$294kHousing & Shelter$250kYouth Development$116kAnimals$25kEducation$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $628k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.7M
$222,653
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD$4,156,727
ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$1,000,775
FEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES$250,000
MARY'S PLACE$250,000
INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$222,653
WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER$160,000
UNITED WAY OF SWC$135,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC$110,000
YMCA OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY$29,903
OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $6k → 11%YOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $6k → 11%THREE BRIDGES RECOVERY CENTER: $9k → 11%LOVE INC: $9k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$945k · 10 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$945k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+47%

Still filing today

50%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $272k · revenue -3%
  • MP
    MARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $265k
  • JE
    JOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue -28%

Funded once

  • AF
    ACACIA FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WI INC
    one grant, 2024 · $19k
  • HC
    HANNAH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +52%
  • TO
    TOWN OF SARATOGA
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women and Children's Horizons Inc

The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.

Human Services
2
West Central Wisconsin Workforce Development Board Inc

Workforce development planning, policy guidance, and oversight of workforce development programs in the west central wisconsin workforce development area

Employment
3
Waukesha Free Clinic Inc

The clinic's mission is to support the health care of uninsured and low-income residents of waukesha county. the clinic provides access to free or discounted services and medications.

—
4
Hope Center Inc

The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…

—
5
Workforce Connections Inc

Wci empowers individuals through employment and training services, helping people of all backgrounds including low-skilled and unskilled adults enter the workforce. we provide economically disadvantaged individuals and those facing…

Employment
6
United Way of Langlade County Inc

United Way uses its global reach and local presence to build stronger, more resilient communities where everyone can thrive. We work to improve the health, education, and economic mobility of every person in every community we serve.

Philanthropy
7
Wisconsin Center for Manufacturing & Productivity

The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.

Education
8
Northwest Wisconsin Concentrated Employment Program Inc

Our mission at northwest cep is to create connections that will empower individuals and groups to drive workforce and community growth.

Employment
9
Workforce Resource Inc

The mission of workforce resource, inc. is to empower people through employment.

Employment
10
United Way of Marquette County

Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

—
11
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
12
South Central Wisconsin Area Health Education Center Inc

Administer education and training programs for health professionals that are aimed at improving access to health care, with an emphasis on rural and under-served communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mary's Place Boarding House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $4,156,727 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INCASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,775 · HealthASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $5,795 · HealthJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $184,903 · OtherJOHN E ALE…WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC: $160,000 · OtherWISCONSIN …DALY DRUG: $96,839 · OtherDALY DRUGSHOPKO PHARMACY: $48,046 · OtherSHOPKO PHA…TRUAX PATIENT SERVICES: $22,500 · OtherODC NETWORK: $25,000 · Other+12 more: $113,540 · Other+12 moreINCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $222,653 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD & ADAMS COUNTIES INC: $135,000 · PhilanthropyFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC: $271,510 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $22,000 · Food & NutritionMARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC: $265,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $11,930 · Human ServicesTHREE BRIDGES RECOVERY WISCONSIN INC: $9,384 · Human ServicesLOVE INC OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY INC: $9,300 · Human Services
Health$5,163,297Other$650,828Philanthropy$357,653Food & Nutrition$293,510Housing & Shelter$265,000Youth Development$110,000Human Services$30,614

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,775 over 1y, 35% of budgetFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC: $271,510 over 2y, 16% of budgetJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $184,903 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD & ADAMS COUNTIES INC: $135,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC: $110,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetODC NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHANNAH CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $11,930 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC: $5,795 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Legacy Foundation of …Incourage Community F…Paper City Savings Ch…Woodtrust Charitable …Alliant Energy Founda…Bell Family Charitabl…Green Bay Packers Fou…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Legacy Foundation of Central WiscWI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc · Incourage Community Foundation Inc · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Green Bay Packers Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Oxford House Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Aspirus Riverview’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home