· Public charity
Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc
In accordance with its mission statement, the aspirus riverview foundation is committed to the communities it serves and to responsibly represent its donors by:1) supporting the work of aspirus riverview hospital and clinics, inc.2) reducing substance abuse and addiction3) improving mental health, especially in adolescents4) improving…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $628k
- $250k+4 grants · $5.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD | $4,156,727 |
| ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $1,000,775 |
| FEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES | $250,000 |
| MARY'S PLACE | $250,000 |
| INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $222,653 |
| WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER | $160,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF SWC | $135,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC | $110,000 |
| YMCA OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY | $29,903 |
| OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC2× · 2022–2025 · $272k · revenue -3%
- MPMARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC2× · 2022–2025 · $265k
- JEJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC4× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue -28%
Funded once
- AFACACIA FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WI INCone grant, 2024 · $19k
- HCHANNAH CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +52%
- TOTOWN OF SARATOGAone grant, 2017 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.
Workforce development planning, policy guidance, and oversight of workforce development programs in the west central wisconsin workforce development area
The clinic's mission is to support the health care of uninsured and low-income residents of waukesha county. the clinic provides access to free or discounted services and medications.
The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…
Wci empowers individuals through employment and training services, helping people of all backgrounds including low-skilled and unskilled adults enter the workforce. we provide economically disadvantaged individuals and those facing…
United Way uses its global reach and local presence to build stronger, more resilient communities where everyone can thrive. We work to improve the health, education, and economic mobility of every person in every community we serve.
The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.
Our mission at northwest cep is to create connections that will empower individuals and groups to drive workforce and community growth.
The mission of workforce resource, inc. is to empower people through employment.
Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
Administer education and training programs for health professionals that are aimed at improving access to health care, with an emphasis on rural and under-served communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mary's Place Boarding House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRUS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD & ADAMS COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC ↗
- Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds ACACIA FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WI INC ↗
- Who funds HANNAH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FRONTIERS INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THREE BRIDGES RECOVERY WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE INC OF SOUTH WOOD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds Oxford House Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc · Incourage Community Foundation Inc · Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Green Bay Packers Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oxford House Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.