Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Incourage Community Foundation Inc

Founded as a traditional community foundation in 1993, incourage evolved into an entrepreneurial nonprofit, dedicated to and led by the people of central wisconsin.

$891k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$127k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$2.8MEducation$2.0MArts & Culture$1.0MYouth Development$959kHuman Services$696kEmployment$478kHealth$342kReligion$179kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $802,994 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $890,656 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $87,662 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $609k
$26,124
Median grant
2
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC$126,513
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP AND TUITION SERVICES$121,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC$105,983
OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC$69,884
ASSUMPTION CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$66,338
ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH$60,631
COMMUNITY PROPERTY INC$58,000
WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION INC$35,985
WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC$26,432
AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN$26,124
PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC$21,055
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA SAMOSET COUNCIL INC$13,926
ASSUMPTION FOUNDATION INC$13,746
CENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INC$10,081
WISCONSIN RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$8,841
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $23k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $21k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES: $20k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES: $19k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES: $17k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES: $16k → 11%THREE BRIDGES RECOVERY WISCONSIN INC: $8k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES: $16k → 11%PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES: $16k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
WI
NY
IA
VA
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 26 repeat orgs$340k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
18

Total granted

$6.1M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+14%

Still filing today

73%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $911k · revenue +460%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $772k · revenue +114%
  • OD
    OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $478k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $62k
  • TS
    THE SCHOOL AT ALTENBURGS FARM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $52k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Wisconsin - River Falls Foundation Inc

An independent, not for profit wisconsin corporation, the uwrf foundation is organized solely for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-river falls. private giving to the foundation is essential in raising the level of excellence at…

Education
2
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
3
Wisconsin Center for Manufacturing & Productivity

The wcmp will grow and nurture the mep's impact in the state of wisconsin by engaging and aligning the best possible resources to help small and medium-sized manufacturers reach their potential.

Education
4
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

5
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
6
Wisconsin Rural Opportunities Inc

To foster the vitality of rural wisconsin, primarily through the promotion of education, improvement of health care services, cultural experiences, and support of the rural economic base.

7
Wisconsin Women's Business Initiative Corporation

Wwbic opens the doors of opportunity by providing any individuals who are interested in starting, strengthening, or expanding businesses with access to resources such as financial products and quality business and personal financial…

8
Westconsin Credit Union

The organization is a cooperative, nonprofit corporation, incorporated under wisconsin state law to encourage thrift among its members, create a source of credit at a fair and reasonable cost, and provide an opportunity for its members to…

9
Wisconsin Community Services Inc

Wisconsin community services advocates for justice and community safety, providing innovative opportunities for individuals to overcome adversity.

Crime & Legal
10
University Research Park Incorporated

The organization acquires, holds, administers, and distributes real and personal property for the benefit of the university of wisconsin (uw)-madison.

Education
11
Waukesha County Community Foundation

Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…

Philanthropy
12
Community Shares of Wisconsin Inc

Community shares of wisconsin (csw), together with its donors and approximately 70 member nonprofits, addresses social, economic, and environmental problems through grassroots activities, advocacy, research and public education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of the Wisconsin Rapids Area Inc and the most unlike its peers is Park Place Adult Day Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development ProgramsDisability Support ServicesRegional Hospital SystemsUniversity Support Organiza…Food Pantries & Basic NeedsEarly Childhood Care CentersMadison Community Developme…Arts Museums and Cultural C…Youth Sports LeaguesAdvocacy and Industry Assoc…Wisconsin Land and Water Co…Community Grantmaking Found…Ymca and Youth Camps
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr13%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr16%46%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr13%33%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/44
the rest of the field
15%
3,145/21,660

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/34
Grantees still filing
22/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP AND TUITION SERVICES INC — $1,289,250 · OtherINTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP AND TUITION SERV…WISCONSIN RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $214,236 · OtherWISCONSIN RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLSASSUMPTION CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INC — $203,487 · OtherASSUMPTION CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INCWOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT-WI — $189,204 · OtherWOOD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT-WIWISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC — $170,672 · OtherASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL — $141,463 · OtherPARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC — $148,264 · OtherFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC — $130,142 · Other+24 more — $774,391 · Other+24 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,271,463 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING I…WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC INC — $259,582 · PhilanthropyWISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA SENIOR CENT…+3 more — $70,560 · PhilanthropyWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $911,009 · Arts & CultureWISCONSIN HIS…CENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $124,337 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL WISCO…+3 more — $23,882 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC — $771,809 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…+1 more — $24,452 · Youth DevelopmentOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $478,269 · EmploymentCOMMUNITY PROPERTY INC — $388,000 · Community ImprovementALEX C DOVE FOUNDATION INC — $157,396 · Health
Other$3,261,109Philanthropy$2,601,605Arts & Culture$1,059,228Youth Development$796,261Employment$478,269Community Improvement$388,000Health$157,396

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $2,271,463 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $911,009 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC — $771,809 over 8y, 15% of budgetOPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC — $478,269 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PROPERTY INC — $388,000 over 8y, 57% of budgetWISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC INC — $259,582 over 8y, 66% of budgetWISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC — $170,672 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetALEX C DOVE FOUNDATION INC — $157,396 over 2y, 67% of budgetPARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC — $148,264 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetFEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC — $130,142 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INC — $124,337 over 8y, 14% of budgetBOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL — $103,551 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetJOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $76,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $67,760 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCHOOL AT ALTENBURGS FARM INC — $51,985 over 1y, 18% of budgetASSUMPTION FOUNDATION INC — $51,576 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD & ADAMS COUNTIES INC — $44,117 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetASPIRUS RIVERVIEW FOUNDATION INC — $28,824 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC — $24,452 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $23,240 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc — $21,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $20,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH INITIATIVE INC — $14,792 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetTHE CENTRAL RIVERS FARMSHED INC — $14,665 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetWISCONSIN FIRE & EMS MEMORIAL INC — $10,125 over 1y, 21% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc — $8,459 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBADGERLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHREE BRIDGES RECOVERY WISCONSIN INC — $7,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $6,318 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAPIDS AREA SOCCER INC — $5,518 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetWISCONSIN RAPIDS COMMUNITY THEATRE INC — $5,298 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL WISCONSIN INC — $5,043 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA INC
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PROPERTY INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS AREA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN RAPIDS FAMILY CENTER INC
  • Who funds ALEX C DOVE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PARK PLACE ADULT DAY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FEEDING OUR COMMUNITIES WITH UNITED SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN CULTURAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds BOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA 627 SAMOSET COUNCIL
  • Who funds JOHN E ALEXANDER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc
  • Who funds THE SCHOOL AT ALTENBURGS FARM INC
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH WOOD & ADAMS COUNTIES INC
  • Who funds ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC
  • Who funds MID-STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Council on Foundations Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL RIVERS FARMSHED INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN FIRE & EMS MEMORIAL INC
  • Who funds LORAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds American Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc
  • Who funds MARY'S PLACE BOARDING HOUSE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation IncWI32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paper City Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Woodtrust Charitable Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Legacy Foundation of Central Wisc · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · Aspirus Riverview Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Jasperson Family Foundation Inc · Alexander Charitable Foundationinc · Delta Dental of Wisconsin Foundation Inc · United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Incourage Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Incourage Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Incourage Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph