· Public charity
Asian Law Caucus
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist in the United States.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Asian American Advancing Justice - Chicago | $241,800 |
| Asian American Advancing Justice - AAJC | $241,800 |
| Asian American Advancing Justice - Atlanta | $241,800 |
| Asian American Advancing Justice - Southern California | $241,800 |
| Jubilee Immigration Advocates | $211,858 |
| The Fresno Center | $211,858 |
| Chinese for Affirmative Action | $211,857 |
| Instituto Lab | $125,000 |
| Asian Community Development Council | $125,000 |
| Communities United for Restorative Youth Justice | $100,000 |
| Restore Oakland Inc | $84,765 |
| Community Works West Inc | $81,708 |
| Mission Action | $63,214 |
| Pan Asian Community Alliance | $20,000 |
| Council on American-Islamic Relations | $17,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $387k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JIJubilee Immigration Advocates5× · 2021–2025 · $949k · revenue +237% · 50% of their budget
- MAMISSION ACTION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $575k · revenue +301%
- AAASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC6× · 2018–2025 · $562k · revenue +560%
Funded once
- NYNew York Taxi Workers Allianceone grant, 2024 · $105k · revenue 0%
- SPSTATE POWER FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +220%
CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
To advance the legal and civil rights of Asian Pacific Americans through direct services, education and advocacy.
Coordinate pro bono legal aid for victims of anti-Asian violence.
AAPIP expands and mobilizes resources for AAPI communities to build a more just and equitable society.
The Coalition of Asian American Leaders (CAAL) is a network organization of Asian Minnesotan leaders harnessing our collective power to improve the lives of community.
CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
The asian american legal defense and education fund (aaldef), founded in 1974, is a national organization that protects and promotes the civil rights of asian americans through litigation, advocacy, education, and organizing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cair-Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
- Who funds THE FRESNO CENTER ↗
- Who funds Jubilee Immigration Advocates ↗
- Who funds MISSION ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC ↗
- Who funds RESTORE OAKLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds Instituto Lab ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds New York Taxi Workers Alliance ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS WEST INC ↗
- Who funds ONE ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds STATE POWER FUND ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR WORKERS' RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds JAKARA MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Every Voice Texas dba Asian Texans for Justice ↗
- Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds CAIR-PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Environmental Network ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC INSTITUTE ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds THE SIKH COALITION ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Movement for Human Integrity ↗
- Who funds Narika ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Gofundmeorg · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Center · The San Francisco Foundation · The California Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Asian Law Caucus funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Asian American Resource Workshop Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.